Free from fear or favour
No tracking. No cookies

How JD Vance’s Attempts to Soften Republican Party’s Position on ‘Sensitive Topics’ Came Unstuck

Vance is judged to have performed better than Tim Walz at the Vice-Presidential debate, but the Minnesota Governor got the better of him when they discussed the 2020 election

Tim Walz speaks during a vice presidential debate hosted by CBS News, with Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance on 1 October. Photo: Associated Press / Alamy
Tim Walz speaks during the US Vice- Presidential debate with JD Vance on 1 October. Photo: Associated Press / Alamy

Byline Times is an independent, reader-funded investigative newspaper, outside of the system of the established press, reporting on ‘what the papers don’t say’ – without fear or favour.

To support its work, subscribe to the monthly Byline Times print edition, packed with exclusive investigations, news, and analysis.

The last big set-piece of the 2024 US election cycle, the Vice-Presidential debate between Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Ohio Senator JD Vance, took place on October 1 and seems likely to have no impact on the electoral outcome.  

That is the conclusion of most pundits and analysts, and the snap reaction of focus groups who watched the debate. Vance is judged to have performed better than Walz, but neither man made any major mistakes or landed devastating blows.  

JD Vance came across as by far the more polished of the two, and better at thinking on his feet.

JD Vance and the Radicalisation of the Right

Donald Trump’s running mate, JD Vance, used to be a harsh critic of the former US president – now he’s a “dutiful ventriloquist of the Trumpian gospel”. Here’s what happened

He clearly aimed to wrong-foot Walz from the start, by playing nice throughout the debate and displaying a human side, in order to undercut Walz’s image as the more likeable of the two.

Vance warmly shook Walz’s hand at the start, repeatedly agreed with points made by “Tim,” and peppered his remarks with references to his working-class background and love for his wife and children.

He also repeatedly expressed empathy, for example, for the victims of Hurricane Helene (“I’m sure Tim agrees with me, my heart goes out to them”), or for families struggling with the cost of living. 

Vance was also clearly on a mission to soften some of the Republican party’s hardest edges on sensitive topics. When Walz said his teenage son had witnessed a school shooting, Vance was quick to express sympathy.

When Walz referred to a woman who had died because she had been unable to get an abortion in her home state of Georgia, Vance agreed it was wrong that anyone should lose their life this way.

He further finessed the issue of abortion by acknowledging that his party “needed to do a better job of earning back people’s trust on this”, for example by adopting a broader pro-family approach, including support for fertility treatment, child care, and affordable housing.  

‘Obscene, Illogical, Unworkable’: The Trump/Vance Plan for Ukraine Revealed

Paul Niland examines J D Vance’s recent statements on the Trump plan to end the war in Ukraine “in 24 hours”

By contrast, Walz appeared nervous and uneasy, especially at the start. He spoke too quickly and many of his remarks were too convoluted to be easily understandable. Sometimes he struggled to find the right word for what he wanted to say.

Walz made an excruciating gaffe when he said he was friends with many “school shooters” when he meant to say the “parents” of victims of school shootings. Most viewers will know what he was trying to say, but MAGA types will have a field day gleefully playing this clip repeatedly on social media

Walz also repeatedly failed to push home an advantage when Vance was on the defensive – for example, pinning down Vance’s role in spreading the false rumour that Haitian immigrants were eating people’s pets in Springfield, Ohio, which had led to armed guards being required to escort Haitian kids going to school. He failed to call out Vance’s blatant lie about not supporting a national ban on abortion.  

Vance was also more deft than Walz in deflecting awkward questions. For example, when Vance was challenged about his comments, long before becoming Donald Trump’s running mate, that he was unfit for office and a mini-Hitler, Vance glibly said “I was wrong” and instead blamed the media for allegedly peddling false narratives about Trump, and Congress for failing Trump by not doing its job properly. 

When Walz was challenged on why he had erroneously claimed to have been in Hong Kong at the time of the Tiananmen Square repression of student protests in China, when he was there several months later, he waffled for several minutes before lamely saying that he was sometimes “a knucklehead”, and that he had misspoken.

However, Walz grew in confidence as the evening went on, while Vance’s veneer of charm and moderation began to wear thin, as he resorted to ever more outlandish claims about Trump’s alleged achievements, and Kamala Harris’s alleged failings.

A Stumbling Trump Receives a Well-Deserved Shellacking at the First Presidential Debate

Vice President Kamala Harris relentlessly prosecuted former President Donald Trump’s record and character during their first televised showdown

On the economy, Walz pointed out that Trump’s mishandling of COVID-19 had devastated the economy, that his tax cuts had favoured the very wealthy, and that most economists agreed his plans for even more tariffs would cause the deficit to balloon, whilst Harris’ economic plans included tax credits for small businesses, support for the middle class, and help for first time home buyers.  

Walz called out Trump for describing climate change as “a hoax”, insisted that there was not a false choice between tackling climate change and creating jobs, and challenged Vance to explain where he was going to find all this supposedly available federal land on which he planned to build new energy plants and housing.

“In Minnesota, we protect our lands. They are there for a reason. This is the problem with treating these things as commodities to make money.”  

He also called out Vance for claiming that Trump had tried to preserve and improve the Affordable Care Act – Obama’s signature healthcare measure – noting it had only been saved in the Senate by the single vote of “the late, great, Senator John McCain”.

In a particularly withering put-down, Walz said that, as a school teacher, he found Trump’s claim that he had a “concept of a healthcare plan” not worthy of a fourth grader.  

On immigration, supposedly the Trump campaign’s strongest suit, Vance dodged answering whether their mass deportation plans would involve family separations, while Walz was able to hammer Trump for blocking a bipartisan bill which would have allocated more resources for securing the border and processing asylum claims more quickly “because it gave him a campaign issue. What does Trump have to talk about if this is resolved?”

‘What I Learned Backstage: Tactical Advice for Kamala Harris’

Dan Kaszeta worked at the White House complex between 1996 and 2008 – he shares his key logistical tips for Harris’ campaign

He also strongly criticised Republicans for demonising and dehumanising migrants, and blaming them for every ill in America.

Walz also made the better arguments on gun violence and abortion. On the former, Walz said the issue could not be entirely explained away by mental health – “sometimes, it really is just about the guns”.

He pointed out that other countries with high rates of gun ownership, such as Finland, were able to come up with workable solutions which did not involve curtailing gun rights.

On the latter, Walz repeatedly exposed the weakness in Vance’s argument that the matter was best left to the states, by arguing that the fate of women “should not be determined by geography”. He said it was wrong to accuse Democrats of being pro-abortion: “We’re pro-women.”  

It’s harder to say who “won” when it came to foreign policy, which was the opening question of the debate against the backdrop of dangerous escalation in the Middle East.  Neither side was willing to be specific about how far they would go in supporting Israel.

Vance made the case that no new wars had broken out during Trump’s first term in office, and that a second Trump Presidency would re-establish “peace through strength”. 

Walz argued that Trump’s character was too “fickle”, that even his own former national security advisors and defence secretaries regarded him as a threat, and that what was needed was “steady leadership”.  

A Midwest Bernie: ‘Tim Walz on the Democrat Ticket Shows Younger Generations Cannot Be Ignored’

Kamala Harris’ choice of running mate has been praised as a ‘top of the leader-board pick’

Walz’s best moment, and by far JD Vance’s worst, came right at the very end, when the moderators asked Vance whether he still held to his stance that if he had been Vice President in 2020 he would not have certified the election.

Vance dodged by saying he was focused on the future, and that the real threat to democracy was Democrat censorship of free speech.  

Walz at last rose to the occasion. Looking genuinely outraged, he said this was an issue on which he and Vance were “miles apart”.

Recalling the events of 6 January, and noting that Trump was still claiming he won the election, Walz directly challenged Vance again to say whether he agreed.

Republican presidential candidate and former US President Donald Trump pictured on July 27. Photo: Associated Press / Alamy
Republican presidential candidate and former US President Donald Trump pictured on July 27. Photo: Associated Press / Alamy

Vance again dodged the question, repeating “I’m focused on the future”. 

Walz described that as a “damning non answer” and went on to say, “I’m pretty shocked by this. He lost the election. This is not a debate.”

Walz then rhetorically asked who would be the “firewall” against Trump, “if he knows he can do anything, including taking an election and his Vice President is not going to stand to it?” Looking at the camera, he concluded: “So, America, you have a clear choice on this election of who’s going to honour democracy and who’s going to honour Donald Trump?”  

I was watching the event at a debate watch party, hosted by a Democrat Party campaigner. Vance’s response on the 2020 election, alongside his extraordinary claim that Trump had “peacefully handed over power”, left attendees momentarily speechless, and then jubilant, as it was the only true “gotcha” moment of the evening. It has since been endlessly replayed by the Harris campaign on social media.

‘Kamala Harris Casts Herself as the True American Patriot in Barnstorming Democratic Convention Speech’

Where Biden’s campaign erred in building up Trump as a larger-than-life threat to democracy, Harris and other speakers sought to take him down with a series of jabs

For me, and many other American voters, who feel Trump represents an existential threat to American democracy, this was also the only issue that really mattered from the debate. But, unfortunately, many viewers will have turned off the TV by the time this came up. 

Those who only watched the opening half of the debate are likely to have taken away the impression of a more capable, and engaging, Vance than has previously come across on the campaign trail, and a more uncertain Walz.  

Nothing during the debate will have fundamentally shifted voters’ overall perceptions of the race, which opinion polls suggest remains too close to call.  

So, what else is left between now and election day on 5 November?

Some believe increased turmoil in the Middle East will play to the Trump campaign’s narrative that the world was more stable under his watch.

Some believe that Trump fatigue and the abortion issue will finally swing voters decisively in Harris’s direction. Maybe a few big last-minute endorsements will change minds, say former President G W Bush endorsing Harris. 

But previous endorsements for her from such unlikely bedfellows as Dick Cheney, Bernie Sanders and Taylor Swift do not seem to have led to a breakthrough.  

ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE

Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.

We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.

Potentially the last big development of the 2024 race, akin to the James Comey moment which many believe sunk Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016, could be the release of new information about Trump’s role in trying to overturn the 2020 election.

A Judge in DC is currently weighing whether to make public part or all of a new 200-page report by investigative Special Counsel, Jack Smith, which some believe may include shocking new revelations.  

In the end, it may just come down to turnout on the day, and whose voters are more energised.  

Meanwhile, the mainstream media are doing voters a gross disservice by largely covering this election as if it is another routine one.

Absolutely nothing is normal about it.  



This article was filed under
,