Outside the system

Greed is Good: The Conservatives’ Trope of the Pandemic

Jonathan Lis explores how the Government has hijacked the success of the vaccine roll-out by the NHS and ideologically repackaged it to selectively suit its agenda

Jonathan Lis explores how the Government has hijacked the success of the vaccine roll-out by the NHS and ideologically repackaged it to selectively suit its agenda

It is now a week since the after-dinner speaker was found out once again. At a meeting of the Conservatives’ 1922 Committee, Boris Johnson declared that “the reason we have the vaccine success is because of capitalism, because of greed, my friends”.

He reportedly withdrew the comments almost immediately, and the BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg suggested that it might have been a joke. And yet it struck a chord for a reason.

Viewing the Coronavirus pandemic through the lens of greed not only illuminates the core tenets of Conservative ideology, but helps to explain the party’s drastic mishandling of the crisis.


The Vaccine Roll-Out

In the context the Prime Minister made the comments, the claim was untrue. The vaccine roll-out has been a triumph neither because of capitalism nor greed.

In raw factual terms, AstraZeneca has delivered the vaccines at cost. The company will not make a profit – indeed, according to the BBC, it will sacrifice £14.5 billion in revenue.

The pharmaceutical industry has won itself few friends among the left in recent years, and Astra has faced pressure in the EU and US over its data and contracts. But few have accused the vaccine manufacturers – yet – of profiteering from the crisis.

Of course, this could change – particularly if the manufacturers refuse, in the long-term, to enable the cheap supply and replication of their products (for example, by not giving up patents). Such an action would deserve shame rather than praise.

The main point, however, is that the vaccine has not been rolled-out by the private sector but by the NHS. Doctors and nurses, assisted by thousands of volunteers, have rapidly and efficiently delivered it to millions of people. This is the direct opposite of capitalism and greed: it is the emblem of a state-funded public service working, not for the interests or profit of private corporations, but for the good of all citizens. As the doctor Rachel Clarke noted: it was not greed but love.

Mapping the Pandemic £1 Billion in Contracts Awarded to Conservative Donors

And yet, the marked absence of something in one area serves to illuminate it elsewhere. The vaccine roll-out is the main response to the pandemic that has not been explicitly about greed – and that is precisely why it has worked.

Contrast the effective, in-house roll-out of the vaccine to the outsourced, £37 billion ‘Test and Trace’ operation. No amount of clever NHS branding can hide the fact that this was a project handed to a private company – Serco – and that it catastrophically failed.

This week, over a year into the pandemic, a study in the British Medical Journal has found continued low levels of adherence with self-isolation and low public awareness, while it took several months for the system to reach more than 60% of contacts. The NHS’s local knowledge and resources were simply ignored, while numerous contact-tracers have blown the whistle on chronic mismanagement and low morale.

Serco is not the only private firm to have been exposed. Private companies have been failing to supply adequate tests, services and personal protective equipment (PPE) for the past year – most egregiously, faulty masks provided by a pest control company and private equity firm respectively. These companies are not answerable to the public but to shareholders and management. Ministers and civil servants come a distant second – and frequently, it seems, not at all.

The key factor here is, of course, public money. Pharmaceutical companies have always benefited from Government investment, and the Government funded much of the research which produced the Oxford/Astra vaccine.

But public money has paid for everything else as well – specifically Test and Trace and PPE for medical and care settings. Not only did that repeatedly fail on its own terms (last spring doctors and nurses had to wear bin liners and care homes had to buy equipment themselves), but even successful contracts have been clouded by allegations of corruption and cronyism. This week, Byline Times published evidence that £2 billion worth of public contracts have been awarded to companies with links to the Conservative Party or its MPs.

The vaccine roll-out does not look like greed, but this surely does: the greed of the private sector taking vast profits from the public purse. It is not a triumph of private capital innovating and expanding, but of using state borrowing and taxation to enrich itself with the minimum of competition, scrutiny or accountability.

Johnson Said ‘Superman’ Brexit Britain Would Take Advantage of Pandemic & Go Its Own Way Seven Weeks Before Lockdown

Byline Times Team

A Conservative Pandemic

Why, then, did Boris Johnson want to celebrate the “capitalism” and “greed” of the vaccine roll-out?

Much of it lies in his character. The Prime Minister finds it self-evidently absurd that some people might be motivated by altruism or public service, or be prepared to make sacrifices. If he is motivated by venality or self-interest, so must everyone else.

He repeated the trope at the weekend when he remarked that people must return to work as they have had “enough days off” over the pandemic. Because he is so absorbed in his deficiencies, he projects them onto others.

But this is also about ideology.

Gone are the days when Conservatives such as Margaret Thatcher would mock the socialist trait of ‘spending other people’s money’. Other people’s money is there to be spent on oneself and one’s friends. And yet the key driver of Thatcherism remains: money must trump everything else.

From the start of the pandemic, Johnson has privileged profit. In his now infamous Greenwich speech in February 2020 – first revealed by Bylin