Outside the system

Nigel Farage Is Killing the Conservative Party and Starmer Must Change Course to Avoid the Same Fate

Telling voters that the Reform leader is right, but they shouldn’t vote for him anyway, is no more likely to work for Labour than it has for the Conservatives, argues Adam Bienkov

Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage with his party's candidates onstage during a campaign event at Stafford Showground, Stafford, whilst campaigning for this week's local elections. Picture date: Wednesday April 30, 2025. Photo: PA Images / Alamy

Read Our Monthly Magazine

And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system

“I’m sad to be in opposition but there’s a part of me that’s excited,” Kemi Badenoch told the Conservative party conference last October.

“We are going to have fun.”

Fast forward to this morning and there was little sign of either the “excitement”, or “fun” the Conservative leader predicted last year.

Far from being unleashed from the political chains of office, Badenoch continues to be heavily tied to them.

Right across the country, in a set of local elections heavily dominated by former Conservative strongholds, the party continues to be severely punished by voters, as they switch in huge numbers to Reform and the Liberal Democrats instead.

The reasons for last year’s defeat have already been well dissected. Fourteen years of low growth, public sector austerity and administrative incompetence lay the ground for a historic collapse in support for a party which had previously been the most electorally successful in Britain’s history.

Yet while in the past recently ousted governing parties quickly regained support in opposition, the opposite now appears to be happening with the Conservatives. Even in the face of growing global economic uncertainty, and an unpopular new Labour government, these results show that Badenoch’s party continues to go backwards.

The reasons for this go well beyond the Conservatives’ recent record in office, to the much more fundamental question of who the party is now actually for. 

Blue Labour on MAGA Square: Maurice Glasman’s Journey to Trumpism

Jon Bloomfield and David Edgar look at the nationalist populist drift of Labour’s anti-progressive tendency


A Failed Realignment

Ever since Brexit, the question of who the Conservative party stands for has been one that Tory politicians have struggled with. For Boris Johnson the answer lay in uniting socially conservative non-metropolitan voters, in opposition to a coalition of Labour’s socially-liberal, university-educated, metropolitan base.

This strategy, which centred around a relatively small number of constituencies in the so-called “red wall” ultimately failed once the hollowness of Johnson’s promises to “level up” those parts of the country became clear. Yet while Johnson’s “realignment” ultimately proved illusory, it was at least a clear electoral strategy. The same cannot be said for what followed it.

In the wake of Liz Truss’ devastating kamikaze raid on the Conservative party’s economic reputation, Conservative party leaders quickly switched to an equally devastating raid on their own record on immigration. Beginning with Rishi Sunak’s ludicrous pledge to “stop the boats”, Conservative politicians succeeded in massively raising the salience of rising immigration numbers, while doing absolutely nothing of substance to actually deal with the issue. The result was that socially conservative voters started to switch in increasing numbers to Reform UK instead, with every attempt by the Conservatives to further mimic Nigel Farage’s talking points, merely convincing even more voters to switch to the real deal.

And as socially conservative Tory voters switched over to Farage, so too did the Conservatives’ more socially liberal base switch over to the Liberal Democrats. Turned off by the increasingly Trumpian pro-Brexit rhetoric of the party leadership, millions of affluent life-long Conservative voters in the South increasingly fled to Ed Davey’s party. The result was a two-sided bleeding of Conservative support that today’s results show is now only getting worse.

Kemi Badenoch Ditches Net Zero Target After Taking Donations From Funders of Tufton Street Climate Denial Group

The Conservative leader and her Shadow Net Zero Secretary took funding from key backers of lobby groups campaigning to curb action against climate change


Repeating Mistakes

This is not a process that the party’s current leader, Kemi Badenoch, appears likely to reverse. Indeed far from realising the error of her ways, the Conservative leader appears intent on merely deepening them. Like an inveterate gambler already several thousand pounds in the red, Badenoch continues to make exactly the same hopeless bets that got her party into this mess in the first place. 

At every turn – from immigration, to climate, to the ECHR – Badenoch keeps betting that her strategy of telling voters that Nigel Farage has been right all along, but that they for some reason shouldn’t vote for him, will eventually come up trumps. That the opposite keeps on happening somehow merely further convinces her to keep on trying. 

In business, the ‘sunk cost fallacy’ is the term for when a failing enterprise continues to pursue a doomed commercial strategy, simply because its owners have already invested so much of their resources into it. In these situations, businesses continue to pour good money after bad, long after it becomes clear that complete reversal is the only sensible remaining option.

This failure should now be an urgent warning to the Labour party not to repeat the