
Read Our Monthly Magazine
And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Everything seemed to be on fire the last time Nicholas Samuels visited Toretsk. A renewed Russian offensive, launched at the end of June, was transforming this once relatively quiet section of the front into an inferno, leaving the remaining residents scrambling to escape.
Russian shelling, which was gradually levelling the small town, had ignited nearby fields, sending up billowing smoke that mixed with smoke from the nearby village of New York, which was also burning. The increased threat of drone attacks only intensified the tension.
“The drone unit that the Russians have near Toretsk seems to delight in hitting non-military targets, but worse, it seems that they were using civilians as bait,” explained Samuels, a 35-year-old humanitarian volunteer originally from the UK.
“There was a police car along the same road as us that got hit; amazingly, no one died, but four individuals who were there to evacuate some elderly people were heavily injured, and then they began to shell the area.”
After nearly three years of continuous combat, Russia’s full-scale war on Ukraine has ushered in an unprecedented era of drone warfare, with both sides using a multitude of models for surveillance and lethal attacks to devastating effect.
As Russian forces continue to push their advances along sections of the Donbas front, the growing prevalence of drones has become a primary threat to soldiers and civilians alike.
For volunteer groups organising evacuations of civilians from frontline areas like Toretsk, these drones have not only multiplied the threats they face but also significantly complicated their efforts to get residents out of harm’s way, as pressure continues to mount on Ukrainian defenders.

“Things have changed,” explained Samuels. “Once upon a time, you could at least access a lot of these places, and it was a reasonable thing to do without massive, massive risk. Obviously, there’s always risk, but now if you don’t have a drone jammer on your vehicle, you could be pretty damn fudged.”
The evacuations that day were coordinated with the Ukrainian military, and despite warnings from soldiers at a checkpoint outside of town about proceeding without a drone-jamming system, Samuels and a small team successfully evacuated six people, including four elderly residents, without incident.
The speed with which the Russians had advanced on Toretsk had caught the remaining residents by surprise. A static front for nearly ten years, it only took two weeks for food and clean water to become scarce, as intense shelling kept people sheltered indoors or in basements.
“They had no water, no food, nothing,” Samuels told Byline Times. “It was rough. We didn’t really know exactly what the status of the city was at that particular point, apart from knowing that New York was in trouble.”
New York is a village to the south of Toretsk that has also been the focus of a Russian summer offensive. All along these frontlines, the presence of first-person-view (FPV) drones has become ubiquitous over the last year.
Relatively inexpensive and highly accurate, FPV drones give pilots a first-person view as they fly into targets and detonate. Without an effective drone-jamming system, they are almost impossible to escape.
Initially deployed in large numbers by Ukrainian forces to counter Russia’s numerical advantage in soldiers and equipment, FPV drones were quickly adopted and turned against Ukrainian defenders.
In September 2023, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that the Russian army had received 140,000 drones that year and planned to expand production, aiming to produce 1.4 million in 2024.
Conversely, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated on 1 October that Ukraine can now produce four million drones annually, and has already produced 1.5 million in 2024 so far.
Investments in drone production and technology have exponentially increased since 2022, with investments rising tenfold in 2023 compared to the previous year. More than $2 billion has reportedly been allocated to Ukrainian drone production in 2024.
These massive increases in the use of drones has consequently led to an increase in casualties among Ukrainian soldiers and civilians up and down the frontline, according to one medic who frequently treats injuries from drones.
“Gunshot wounds have been the least of our problems; most casualties are from drones, artillery, and mines,” explained Jackson, a 40-year-old combat medic originally from Belarus, who currently serves in Ukraine’s Third Separate Assault Brigade. Jackson is his callsign.
Russian artillery works well on trenches and positions that are not moving, but the drones are horrible. They’re more discreet and cause more of our casualties these days. There’s an obvious need for more drone jammers
Jackson, combat medic
Countermeasures against Russian drones typically rely on devices that jam the radio frequencies and GPS signals drones use to communicate with their pilots. However, these devices can greatly range in price and effectiveness.
While they can be shot down, their speeds, of up to 100 km/hour, make them difficult targets. The high cost of most drone jamming systems means many volunteers often work without them if necessary.
A main site of evacuations as of late has been the strategic town Pokrovsk, which sits roughly 50km to the southwest of Toretsk and is the current focus of Russian efforts.

