Free from fear or favour
No tracking. No cookies

The House of Commons Wants Your Views on Modernising Parliament – Just Don’t Say ‘Knock it Down’ 

It’s a bid to clean up Parliament’s act after years of sleaze and lobbying scandals

Campaigner Steve Bray and the Houses of Parliament. Photomontage: PA Images / Alamy

Byline Times is an independent, reader-funded investigative newspaper, outside of the system of the established press, reporting on ‘what the papers don’t say’ – without fear or favour.

To support its work, subscribe to the monthly Byline Times print edition, packed with exclusive investigations, news, and analysis.

The House of Commons has launched a public consultation on how to modernise its procedures, standards, and working practices.

The newly established Modernisation Committee, set up by the Labour Government and chaired by Commons leader Lucy Powell MP, is calling for submissions from individuals and organisations on what topics it should prioritise when it comes to reform.

The committee has set out three aims: to drive up standards, improve the Commons culture and working practices, and reform Parliamentary procedures to “enhance effectiveness”. 

EXCLUSIVE

Robert Jenrick Accepted £25,000 Donation from Firm Controlled by Sanctioned Oligarch

The Conservative leadership candidate received the money from a company controlled by billionaire Sir Len Blatvnik – who has been sanctioned by the Ukrainian government

Powell said: “In recent years the reputation of Parliament has been tarnished. The Modernisation Committee is up and running looking at how it can change Parliament to raise standards, improve working practices and culture and make House of Commons procedures more effective.”

The committee is particularly interested in examples from other parliaments and existing work that could inform their efforts.

Submissions can be made through the committee’s website until 3pm on 16 December.

The committee expects to publish most of the submissions it receives, but won’t consider individual complaints or problems. Instead, it will use the submissions to shape its ongoing programme of work.

ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE

Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.

We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.

“There’s much to do, and the Committee is raring to go,” Powell said.

The committee is meant to be part of a broader effort to restore public trust in parliamentary institutions. MPs are formally banned from engaging in paid lobbying, and in July Commons leader Powell went further in banning MPs from providing paid advice on public policy and current affairs, or paid advice in general terms about how Parliament works. 

There is likely to be a clampdown on MPs taking large payments or jobs with media outlets, following a flurry of Conservative and Reform UK MPs moonlighting with presenter roles on GB News

EXCLUSIVE

GB News Spent Half a Million Mainly on Right Wing MPs – Nearly Half on the Reform Party

11 MPs have been paid over £500,000 by the channel over the past year, with £200,000 going to just two Reform Party MPs

The Modernisations Committee will only look at potential reforms to rules on MPs conduct and how the Commons works, rather than, for example, wider political reforms such as changing the voting system to put MPs there in the first place. 

Critics will argue that more fundamental reforms may be needed to address the troubles facing the British political system, and the cronyism scandals seen in recent years. 

Byline Times asked readers to submit their ideas for overhauling the Commons. 

Andy Flaherty‬ on BlueSky replied: “Move it out of London – a greenfield [site] outside Stoke on Trent. Provide flats for politicians….Up their pay to £150K and ban second jobs except for keeping up professional qualifications. Stop gifts above £30.” 

Peter Smith on the same platform backed the call to “move Parliament to the provinces”.

“Darlington has excellent road, rail and air links. [Construct] a new building like a scaled up Scottish Parliament, with accommodation nearby of a Premier Inn standard,” he added.

Sarah Clarke wrote on Threads: “Build a compensated mechanism like jury service for specialist practitioners as advisors. Folk who get [the] operational nitty gritty, [but] without time and means to contribute to policy formulation and problem-solving.”

She added it would be a “counterweight for the strategy focus of lobbyists and think tanks.”

Jack Price-Harbach, the Lib Dem Parliamentary Spokesperson for Mid Cheshire, called for electronic voting for MPs, noting: “The 8 minute rush to get to the lobby is ridiculous if you’re not in the chamber. 

“MPs should be allowed to vote remotely but only when they are within the Palace of Westminster/Portcullis House etc.”

Another reader added a call to set up a new “public scrutiny committee” of citizens. It would “not be made up of individuals in the parliamentary system, or bound to party political lines.” 

Christina Lynch suggested MPs “work normal business hours”, ending the scourge of late-night sittings that are often seen as putting off female candidates, disabled people and those with caring responsibilities. 

Conservatives Mount Bungled Defence of Hereditary Peers in Bizarre Commons Debate

Does the Conservative Party support or oppose the idea of hereditary peers? Most of them won’t say…

Sarah Bakewell added on Threads her request for “a completely independent HR department” as well as formal contracts of employment for MPs (they do not currently have a job description or formal contracts). 

She also backed giving MPs the ability to use words like “lie” and “liar” about other MPs in the chamber. Labour MP Dawn Butler was reprimanded for calling then-PM Boris Johnson a liar in the last Parliament, language deemed “un-parliamentary” by the House authorities. 

One reader called for serious breaches in the Commons rules to be considered criminal offences, with “appropriate sanctions up to and including fines, prison time, and expulsion from Parliament.” 

They demanded that anti-corruption laws, like the Bribery Act, be applied more clearly to MPs. 

“Currently corruption is permitted, as long as you declare who is bribing you,” they argued. The word ‘corruption’ is often in the eye of the beholder (or rather, parliamentary standards officials), when it comes to MPs and peers. 

The Conservative Party is Loving Opposition – Which is Exactly Why They Will Stay There

The Conservative leadership candidates are embracing the freedom of losing all power and responsibility, with inevitable consequences

Another reader called for MP’s to be required to provide their constituents with a regular log of their activities, “so it can be seen whether they’re working.” 

Parliament is set to vote early in 2025 on what to do about the fact it is in an urgent state of disrepair, with the listed building under a constant state of high alert for the risk of fire and falling masonry. MPs could vote to ‘decant’ to another building during renovations, but some are reluctant, whether due to sentimentality or convenience.  

Submit your ideas for reforms to the House of Commons directly to the committee here.


Suggestions from Byline Times readers so far…

Location and Infrastructure

Voting and Procedures

Accountability and Ethics

Conduct in the Chamber

Electoral and Structural Reform 

Note: These ideas would not be considered by the Committee, which is concerned only with conduct, standards and processes within the House of Commons, not elections to it. 

Compensation and Benefits

Subscribers Get More from JOSIAH

Josiah Mortimer also writes the On the Ground column, exclusive to the print edition of Byline Times.

So for more from him…


Written by

This article was filed under
, ,