Read Our Monthly Magazine
And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
The Conservative Party’s handling of the much-anticipated death of the Conservative Party’s majority has spawned a wide array of emotions.
For many, there has been a resignation, both emotional and – with 75 Conservative MPs choosing not to stand again on 4 July – actual.
For others, there has been a focus on what a much smaller Conservative Party might look like, and their corresponding places in it: the fight for the soul of the party by both those on its right and left, evidenced in the emerging ‘Suella Braverman versus Tom Tugendhat’ camps.
Then there are those with rage. In particular, there is the anger on display by Johnny Mercer, Minister for Veterans’ Affairs.
Veteran Blocked From Using Army ID to Vote ‘Was Veterans Minister Johnny Mercer’s Sergeant Major’ in Afghanistan
Adam Diver became embroiled in a row with the minister after Mercer branded a Tweet about him being denied a vote as “fake news from a fake bloke”
I have outlined previously in these pages my reasons as to why anyone should be concerned about Mercer’s competence, and the way in which he has personified a broader right-wing shift in British politics that has prioritised military interests over human rights. Not least, I have argued, there is cause for concern about his controversial handling of the Overseas Operations Bill, and his frequent disregard for accountability and detail.
But this election has shown a new, furious face to the man.
In the heat of the campaign, Mercer, a former Army officer, accused his fellow veteran and Labour opponent, Fred Thomas, of lying about his military record during a hustings event in Plymouth.
Mercer claimed that Thomas had never served in combat missions, as reported by the Guardian last year. Mercer accused Thomas of “fraud”, of being a “Walter Mitty”, and of being “deeply offensive and deeply disrespectful”.
Mercer had previously accused Thomas of serving “five minutes in uniform”, when Thomas had, in fact, served seven years (compared to Mercer’s 10).
Johnny Mercer Sought to Whitewash this Country’s Human Rights Abuses – his Departure as a Minister is Only a Good Thing
Iain Overton dissects what the Veterans Minister’s farewell reveals about the man himself and a wider right-wing shift in British politics favouring the military
The accusations were quickly condemned by Labour Leader Keir Starmer, who described Mercer as “sad and desperate” and criticised the Conservatives for putting party interests above the country.
Thomas, a former Royal Marine Captain, responded by stating that he was unable to discuss much of his service due to its sensitive nature. But, as commentator and broadcaster Carol Vorderman noted on X (formerly Twitter): “Fred Thomas has not said the things Johnny Mercer is accusing him of saying… He hasn’t said them.”
A letter was also published from the Commanding Officer of the UK Special Forces Support Group that noted that Thomas had led command “on operations overseas… in a range of hostile and challenging environments”. Given that in Afghanistan, where Thomas served, 223 British soldiers were killed from improvised explosive devices (IEDs) – a death toll accounting for more than half (56.3%) of the combat deaths there – any service in Afghanistan would have come with tremendous risk.
The backlash against Mercer’s comments were swift.
Sam Kiley, a well-respected Sky News journalist, stated: “I can confirm that Fred Thomas has served overseas on active service in places I have myself also worked.”
Mike Tapp, a Labour candidate and former Intelligence Corps officer, said that Mercer’s attempts to push Thomas to break confidentiality rules on Special Services missions were inappropriate and disrespectful. “Service always comes before politics,” he said.
But the episode raises some important questions, not least about Mercer’s own behaviour.
