
Read our Monthly Magazine
And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Minutes ago, Georgia’s government passed its Kremlin-style law on ‘foreign influence’ targeting independent journalists and NGOs. After weeks of massive protests, brutal state violence and wild diplomatic spats with international partners, the measures have now brought this historically European-facing country’s relations with the West to their lowest point since independence from the Soviet Union.
“The Georgian Dream government is completing its seizure of power, subjugating civil society with arbitrary, intrusive and vindictive regulations,” says Hans Gutbrod, a professor of public policy at Tbilisi’s Ilia State University. “What is going on is best described as a coup against Georgia’s constitutional order.”
Since the law was re-tabled in April, following the ruling Georgian Dream party’s abortive first attempt last March, the South Caucasian country has fallen into the throes of a Belarusian-style crackdown against the bill’s intended targets, with dozens of opposition figures hospitalised in attacks by security forces. Hundreds of others have received menacing phone calls, even death threats, while some have even been forced to flee the country ahead of prosecution on draconian charges of inciting a “coup” over their participation in ongoing demonstrations.

Georgian Dream’s law on ‘foreign influence’ will impose harsh restrictive measures against independent media and NGOs receiving funding from abroad, making it difficult, perhaps even impossible, for the country’s otherwise vibrant civil society to continue operating in the coming months.
Amid these developments, the EU has signalled the law, a copy of one used by the Putin regime to crush opposition amid the war in Ukraine, spells an end to the immediate hopes of more than 90% of the Georgian public for one day joining the bloc.
Those with little knowledge of Georgia’s recent history may have found it bewildering how the government of a country part-occupied by Russia since the 1990s, and which itself briefly went to war with Moscow in 2008, now appears to be steering a deepening authoritarian course back to the Kremlin’s sphere of influence.
To understand, it is crucial to grasp the overwhelming control over public life exerted by Bidzina Ivanishvili, the ruling party’s Russian-made oligarch founder, since 2012, and the difficulties he has lately faced attempting to retrieve some of his vast wealth after he claims to have been the victim of fraud.
Sources with access to the billionaire Georgian businessman’s inner circle have previously explained to Byline Times how Ivanishvili believes his money troubles are the product of “de facto” Western sanctions for his longstanding ties to the Putin regime and corrupt hold over Georgia’s political institutions.
These sources believe the ‘foreign influence’ law represents an attempt to muzzle domestic watchdogs ahead of Ivanishvili likely transferring his remaining offshore assets to Georgia following changes to the country’s tax regulations that were quietly pushed through last month.
Others add that the measures – which will adversely impact Georgia’s prospects of one day joining the EU – also indicate a wider geopolitical bet on Ivanishvili’s part ahead of a shift in the global order should Russia emerge victorious in Ukraine – but one that nevertheless falls short of an unconditional, wholesale embrace of the Kremlin.
“Ivanishvili is not pro-Russian or pro-Western – Ivanishvili is just pro-Ivanishvili,” explains Nodar Kharshiladze, founder of Tbilisi think-tank, the Georgian Strategic Analysis Centre. “On the one hand, he believes he’s already under unofficial sanctions by the West, but on the other he’s also afraid of Putin, and he doesn’t want to be directly under Russia’s control because that would limit his influence in Georgia.”
Since the chances of negotiating with Western partners on the law’s provisions were abruptly taken off the table following an unexpectedly abrupt veto from Georgia’s pro-European President Salome Zurabishvili just over a week ago, the US and the EU have both become markedly more bullish in their stance against Georgian Dream.
In recent days, the State Department has promised travel bans on officials responsible for pushing the law through, as well as a prospective package of sanctions and a freeze on government aid.
Meanwhile, several EU countries, including Estonia, the Netherlands, Czechia and Sweden have also lobbied for restrictive measures including not only sanctions and a suspension of state assistance, but possibly revoking visa-free travel for Georgian citizens.
Amid the growing cloud of what one analyst has described as “a complete financial and political disaster” for the Georgian public, there does appear to be faint light emerging at the end of the tunnel for the country’s overwhelmingly pro-European electorate.
Byline Times

