Can Women Be Safe in Britain when the Police Fail to Hold their Own to Account?
It’s been a bad week for violence against women, with a young woman killed on London’s streets and an exclusive report of how police found guilty of sexual misconduct keep their jobs – even when that job exposes them to victims of sexual violence
Detectives from the Metropolitan Police have said that London’s streets are “safe for women”, as police in Greenwich hand out rape alarms to women, in the wake of the killing of 28-year-old teacher Sabina Nessa.
The primary school teacher was killed while walking in a local park. A man has been arrested on suspicion of murder.
The statement from the Met Police has provoked anger from women, with this horrific killing coming just six months after another woman was murdered while walking home: Sarah Everard. Her killer was one of the police’s own, Wayne Couzens.
And it comes at a time when, between 2016 and 2021, there were 56,933 rape allegations in the capital, of which only 6,883 were solved.
Safety is more than a word. It can’t simply be stated and then, like magic, the fears evaporate. For women, safety starts with having equal access to public space as their male peers. It is not being told to stay home, walk in groups, avoid the dark, take out your headphones, don’t wear this colour clothing, or this length of skirt, don’t get drunk, just leave him. It’s knowing that when the worst happens, you’ll be believed and not blamed.
Safety also means that, when the worst happens, the people who are in charge of supporting women to find justice are not, in fact, perpetrators themselves.
The Byline Intelligence Team has reported on the rates of impunity facing police officers found guilty of gross misconduct in relation to sex crimes, including rape and sexual assault. Freedom of Information requests revealed how more than half (52%) of Met Police officers kept their jobs after independent panels found them guilty of sexual misconduct, including against colleagues.
Across England and Wales, 14 officers between 2017 and 21 were found to have targeted vulnerable women for sex, abusing their power and undermining trust in victims and witnesses.
The failings of the police when it comes to violence against women and girls is not new. When the taxi driver John Worboys was first accused of rape, the police failed to act. His first victim told Channel 4 News that she wished she had been “more believable”. Some estimates state that he raped up to 100 women.
Couzens, who entered a guilty plea for the rape, abduction and murder of Sarah Everard, was twice accused of indecent exposure. Neither incident appeared to have an impact on his policing career, and this likely had an impact on women’s safety.
Some of the cases identified by the Byline Intelligence Team involved police officers sending messages to minors, having sex with vulnerable witnesses, and failing to properly investigate sex crimes. Officers found guilty of owning images of child abuse were fired – but how long were they engaged in abuse before losing their job? How many vulnerable women passed through their doors?
How can women feel safe in London, and across the UK, when those charged with keeping us safe are guilty themselves – both of the crimes they are investigating, and of failing to care?
A Collapse in Trust
In recent years, there has been an increase in reporting of male violence against women and girls, and more and more conversations about its causes and impacts. The Government has even consulted on a strategy around the issue, ensuring that it is on the national agenda.
But, while progress has been made on awareness – powered in part by the #MeToo movement around sexual harassment and assault – women are struggling to access justice. Rape prosecutions in England and Wales are at a historic low. A woman may be more likely to report violence than in the past, but she now has only a one in 70 chance of seeing her rapist convicted.
Raising awareness about violence is not enough – not when the police have have been cancelling records of rape (19 forces in England and Wales wrongly did so), and ‘no-criming’ rape allegations (in 2014, a report found that 26% of sexual offences were recorded as ‘no crime’). And it is not enough when some police officers abuse their power and harass female colleagues, only to keep their jobs.
The concern is that, while laudable progress has been made to encourage women to report, that progress risks being undone when they come into contact with the criminal justice system.
A dossier of evidence gathered by a coalition of women’s charities found that women who reported sexual violence had their cases dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service for a variety of reasons that are linked to victim blaming. This includes women being intoxicated, sharing sexual messages with the alleged perpetrator, and being in a relationship with the alleged perpetrator.
These outdated attitudes from the justice system have fuelled a collapse in rape prosecutions, and risk putting women off reporting lest they be blamed for the violence committed against them.
But what the Byline Intelligence Team investigation shows is that the behaviour of police officers could also be a barrier to women reporting sex crimes.
How can a woman confidently report sexual violence to the police when her case may be heard by an officer guilty of gross misconduct in relation to sex crimes who has remained in post? How much faith can the bereaved have when officers investigating the murders of two sisters are found to have swapped inappropriate messages about the crime scene?
How can women trust the police who tell us we are safe while also delivering safety advice that denies women access to public space on equal footing with men? Safety advice that suggests that, deep down, women are to blame for the violence committed against us?
Of course, there are many good police officers who take violence against women and girls seriously and who are determined to tackle the epidemic that kills a woman in the UK every three days. But, for too long, leadership within the police has relied on a ‘bad apple’ explanation that masks the deep-seated issues of sexism and victim blaming when it comes to gender-based violence.
The work of the Byline Intelligence Team exposes this as little more than a brushing aside of real failings: when more than half of Met Police officers found guilty of sexual misconduct by an independent panel can keep their jobs, this isn’t about bad apples but a rotten bushel.
Not Putting Up With It
Something has shifted this past year. In the wake of Sarah Everard’s murder, women rallied together, organised marches and vigils, and refused to be silent. They refused to accept the safety advice and the narrative that women should change our behaviour to ‘keep ourselves safe’ while men are free to occupy public space.
On the anniversary of the murder of Bibaa Henry and Nicole Smallman, women once again gathered to together and held a vigil in the park where the sisters were killed, while others joined in virtually, lighting candles in their own homes.
Now, as another young woman was killed while walking through the streets we are told are safe, women are organising, with vigils planned in London and at the Labour Party Conference in Brighton, and women encouraged to join in virtually.
This matters. There is strength in coming together. There is sisterhood and solidarity in sharing grief and anger. There is a message being sent: we will not put up with this anymore.
But what the past six months – if not longer – has shown is that awareness-raising and conversations can only go so far. Women don’t need to have their awareness raised about male violence: we live with it. We see it, we experience it, we care for friends who are bruised and afraid, or friends care for us.
And, while a Government strategy on gender-based violence is welcome, it’s time for action and not just words. Not least when a decade of Conservative austerity has shredded the safety net for women experiencing male violence, from cuts to the police to refuge closures and a welfare system that empowers controlling abusers.
Women need safety, that’s true. But safety cannot exist when we are told to keep ourselves safe, when we are blamed for failing to do so, and when male violence is normalised and accepted. Safety cannot exist when the police are failing to hold their own to account.
In the months between Sarah Everard’s murder and Sabina Ness’ death, at least 80 women have been killed where men are the principle suspect or have been convicted. Here are their names, recorded by the Counting Dead Women project coordinated by Karen Ingala-Smith:
- 3 March 2021: Sarah Everard, 33
- 4 March 2021: Geetika Goyal, 29
- 4 March 2021: Imogen Bohajczuk, 29
- 5 March 2021: Wenjing Xu, 16
- 19 March 2021: Karen McClean, 50
- 19 March 2021: Stacey Knell, 30
- 23 March 2021: Smita Mistry (also known as Smita Saunders), 32
- 23 March 2021: Samantha (Sammy) Mills, 31
- 25 March, 2021: Patricia Audsley, 66
- 26 March 2021: Phyllis Nelson, 76
- 27 March 2021: Klaudia Soltys, 30
- 29 March 2021: Simone Ambler, 49
- 1 April 2021: Emma McArthur, 49
- 1 April 2021: Sherrie Milnes, 51
- 4 April 2021: Constanta Bunea, 50
- 6 April 2021: Jacqueline Grant, 54
- 9 April 2021: Loretta Herman, 85
- 9 April 2021: Egle Vengaliene, 34
- 10 April 2021: Sally Metcalf, 68
- 13 April 2020: Sarah Keith, 26
- 18 April 2021: Peggy Wright, 83
- 23 April 2021: Charmaine O’Donnell, 25
- 23 April 2021: Michelle Cooper, 40
- 25 April 2021: Kerry Bradford, 57
- 27 April 2021: Julia James, 53
- 30 April 2021; Beth Aspey, 34
- 2 May 2021: Susan Booth, 62
- 3 May 2021: Maya Zulfiquar, 26
- 4 May 2021: Maria Rawlings, 45
- 4 May 2021: Chenise Gregory, 29
- 9 May 2021: Agnes Akom, 20
- 10 May 2021: Wendy Cole, 70
- 11 May 2021: Caroline Crouch, 20
- 12 May 2021: Svetlana Mihalachi, 53
- 12 May 2021: Nicola Kirk, 45
- 13 May 2021: A 32-year-old woman who has not been named
- 25 May 2021: Agita Geslere, 61
- 26 May 2021: Lauren Wilson, 34
- 27 May 2021: Peninah Kabeba, 42
- 29 May 2021: Jill Hickery
- 31 May 2021: Bethany Vincent, 26
- 1 June 2021: Esther Brown, 67
- 1 June 2021: Michaela Hall, 49
- 1 June 2021: Mildred Whitmore, 84
- 2 June 2021: Stacey Clay, 39
- 11 June 2021: Linda Hood, 68
- 16 June 2021: Marlene Coleman, 53
- 18 June 2021: Sophie Cartlidge, 39
- 18 June 2021: Gracie Spinks, 23
- 19 June 2021: Kim Dearden, 63
- 19 June 2021: Michelle Hibbert, 29
- 22 June 2021: Sally Poynton, 44
- 23 June 2021: Catherine Wardleworth, in her 70s
- 29 June 2021: Sukhjit Badial, 73
- 3 July 2021: Elsie Pinder, 66
- 4 July 2021: Catherine Stewart, 54
- 4 July 2021: Ishrat Ahmed, 52
- 7 July 2021: Tamara Padi, 45
- Katie (Kathleen) Brankin, 37
- 13 July 2021: Sandra Hughes, 63
- 23 July 2021: Beatrice Stoica, 36
- 24 July 2021: Pat (Patricia) Holland, 83
- 26 July 2021: Louise Kam, 71
- 31 July 2021: Yordanos Brhane, 19
- 31 July 2021: Amanda Selby, 15
- 1 August 2021: Malgorzata Lechanska, 37
- 7 August 2021: Megan Newborough, 23
- 9 August 2021: Diana Nichols, 57
- 12 August 2021: Maxine Davison (Chapman) 51
- 12 August 2021: Kate Shepherd, 66
- 14 August 2021: Bella Nicandro, 76
- 15 August 2021: Eileen Barrott, 50
- 19 August 2021: Sharron Pickles 45
- 23 August 2021: Helen Anderson, 41
- 27 August 2021: Maddie Durdant-Hollamby, 22
- 2 September 2021: Fawziyah Javed, 31
- 11 September 2021: Ingrid Matthew, 5
- 19 September 2021: Terri Harris, 35
- 19 September 2021: Sukhjeet Uppal, 40
- Sabina Ness, 28
OUR JOURNALISM RELIES ON YOU
Byline Times is funded by its subscribers. Receive our monthly print edition and help to support fearless, independent journalism.
New to Byline Times? Find out more about us
SUBSCRIBE TO THE PRINT EDITION
A new type of newspaper – independent, fearless, outside the system. Fund a better media.
Don’t miss a story! Sign up to our newsletter (and get a free edition posted to you)
Our leading investigations include: empire & the culture war, Brexit, crony contracts, Russian interference, the Coronavirus pandemic, democracy in danger, and the crisis in British journalism. We also introduce new voices of colour in Our Lives Matter.