Free from fear or favour
No tracking. No cookies

Government Departments Breaking Guidance on Board Members’ Conflicts of Interest

Sam Bright reports that major departments have failed to log the interests of their non-executive directors

A UK Government Cabinet meeting in 2020. Photo: Andrew Parsons/No10 Downing St

Government DepartmentsBreaking Guidanceon Board Members’ Conflicts of Interest

Sam Bright reports that major departments have failed to log the interests of their non-executive directors

A number of Government departments are failing to follow official guidance on the declaration of board members’ conflicts of interest.

Every Government department has a board, chaired by the Secretary of State, which provides advice on strategy and scrutinises its overall performance. Each board also includes the Permanent Secretary – the most senior Civil Servant in a department – as well as junior ministers.

External appointments to the boards of Government departments are also commonplace, with 87 external directors holding positions as of 1 April 2021. These individuals are drawn from the ranks of former officials and advisors, as well as current business leaders.

Consequently, though board members make few contributions to the daily running of departments, there is a high likelihood that external advisors have ongoing business interests that may pose a risk of a conflict of interest.

The Treasury, for example, has several non-executive board members who work in senior positions for major domestic banks. The recent Greensill Capital scandal has offered a taste of the potential conflicts that can arise from the blurred boundaries between Government and private sector work.

As a result, the Cabinet Office provides advice on how departments can mitigate these risks and ensure that business interests are declared openly and transparently. In its code of conduct for the board members of public bodies, it states:

“You must comply with the rules of the body on handling conflicts of interests. As a minimum, these will require you to declare publicly, usually in the body’s register of interests, any private financial or non-financial interests of your own, or of close family members, which may, or may be perceived to, conflict with your public duties.”

The code of conduct adds: “The principles set out in this code apply to all non-executive members on the boards of Government departments, non-ministerial departments, executive agencies, non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) and national public corporations.”

Yet, several major Government departments do not provide an up-to-date public register of the interests held by their non-executive board members.

A list of the releases through Freedom of Information requests shows that the Cabinet Office, the Department for International Trade and the Ministry of Justice filed a register of their board members’ interests in 2020. However, other departments are notably absent from this list.

The Home Office’s 2019-20 annual report and accounts states that: “Board members and key senior management staff are subject to a standard annual interests review, stating whether they, their spouses or close family members have been in a position of influence or control in organisations with which the Home Office has transactions.”

However, this does not fulfil the Cabinet Office’s criteria, which states that departments should, at a minimum, declare all of the private interests of board members – not just the organisations “with which the Home Office has transactions”.

It does not appear as though the Home Office has publicly released its “annual interests review”. Indeed, it is not included in its annual report and accounts.

Likewise, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) notes that its financial statements record any transactions with “organisations whom our ministers, non-executive directors or board members have connections”.

Like the Home Office, this pledge does not match the official guidance, which focuses on more than departmental transactions. But, unlike the Home Office, the DHSC does declare these transactions in its annual report and accounts.

“Every Government department regularly reviews its board members’ relevant interests to ensure any potential conflicts of interest – if and when they arise – are managed in line with the code of conduct for board members,” a DHSC spokesperson said.

Neither the Cabinet Office nor the Home Office responded to Byline Times’ request for comment.

But these are just two examples. It appears as though 16 of the 19 Government departments with external non-executive directors have not produced a distinct list featuring the private interests of their board members in recent years.

To illustrate why this is important, here is a list of some of the external board members at Government departments that have not released a conflicts of interest register:

Nigel Boardman, Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS)
As of 1 April, he was a non-executive director at BEIS. He is now leading the Government’s inquiry into the Greensill scandal

Nick Timothy, Department for Education
A former advisor to Theresa May and a Daily Telegraph columnist

Henry Dimbleby, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
Owner of the restaurant chain LEON and son of broadcaster David Dimbleby

Ben Goldsmith, DEFRA
Founder of an investment firm and brother of Conservative politician Lord Zac Goldsmith, who also works in the department

Rachel Wolf, Department for Work and Pensions
Co-author of the 2019 Conservative Party Manifesto and founding partner at Public First – a communications and research company that has been awarded Government contracts during the Coronavirus pandemic

Doug Gurr, Department of Health and Social Care
Formerly of Amazon and McKinsey – both of which have won Government contracts during the pandemic

Richard Meddings, Treasury
Executive chairman of TSB Banks

Pamela Chesters, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Former advisor to Boris Johnson when he was Mayor of London

This does not mean that any of these individuals are unsuitable appointments. Rather – even as a quick Google search can reveal – they all have personal and corporate interests that should be disclosed publicly. They are highly likely to also have other interests that are not easily searchable.

It is also worth reiterating that departments, not the individuals themselves, are responsible for releasing the interests of their board members.

This subject has been drawn into sharp focus as a result of the Greensill scandal – with numerous reports exposing former Prime Minister David Cameron’s efforts to lobby senior ministers on behalf of the now defunct financial services firm.

In recent days, it has also been revealed that Bill Crothers, one of the country’s top civil servants during the Cameron years – in charge of Government procurement – took a second job at Greensill while he was still working in the Cabinet Office. The appointment had been approved by the department and the Office of the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments.

Several parliamentary inquiries have now been launched into the Greensill affair, private sector political lobbying, and the conflicts of interest of Government officials.

Perhaps they could start by encouraging all departments to release a full register of their board members’ interests.

Written by

This article was filed under
, ,