CJ Werleman reports on the third mass shooting in a week in America in Boulder, Colorado, and explores how the country could start to stop such events happening with alarming frequency

A male suspect walked into a grocery store in Boulder, Colorado, yesterday armed with an AR15 semi-automatic assault rifle, shooting and killing anyone within sight. This was the third mass shooting in a week and the 101st since the start of the year. It came just days after a white domestic terrorist shot dead six Asian Americans in Atlanta.

Put simply, the COVID-19 pandemic is ending and mass shootings in America are resuming, after 2020 saw the fewest number of mass shootings in the country in a decade – something criminologists attribute to lockdown and social distancing measures.

Whether the authorities deem the gunman’s rampage to be driven by hate, revenge, terrorism or something else, American citizens can expect a repeat of the same events that have occurred after previous violent attacks. Candle-lit vigils for the dead will be followed by widespread calls for gun control laws, which will ignite the right-wing media to loudly scream: ‘Democrats are coming for your guns!’

Paranoid by the prospect of Congress passing sensible gun control laws – including the need for federal background checks – right-wing Americans will drive to their nearest gun store in droves to stock up on their favourite battlefield armoury. This includes the AR-15 assault rifle, the weapon of choice for the gunmen who carried out mass casualty attacks at Sandy Hook, Connecticut (26 dead); Aurora, Colorado (12 dead); Parkland, Florida (17 dead); San Bernardino, California (16 dead); Las Vegas, Nevada (61 dead); Orlando, Florida (49 dead); and the Tree of Life Synagogue, Pennsylvania (11 dead).

“Today it’s a tragedy in Boulder, Colorado,” tweeted former US Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, who was shot in an assassination attempt in 2011. “This past weekend it was a house party in Philadelphia. And last week it was an armed attack on Asian American women in the Atlanta area. It doesn’t have to be this way. It’s beyond time for our leaders to take action.”

In this ritualisation of gun violence, however, political action never follows perfunctory “thoughts and prayers”. Instead, what follows is a flooding of the media zone with gun lobby-generated talking points and pro-gun propaganda. If we arm every teacher, priest, imam, rabbi, retail assistant, cinema usher, bus driver and barista with a gun, then there will be no more mass shootings, so the gun lobby’s logic goes. 

‘The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun’ has become the National Rifle Association’s mantra – a patently absurd claim given that there are now more guns than people in the United States. Just six days ago, the NRA tweeted praise for a judge in Colorado who blocked a ban on AR-15 sales in – well, you guessed it – Colorado.

A mere two hours after the Boulder shooting began, Republican Congresswoman Lauren Boebert, a representative of Colorado’s third district, sent her supporters an email with the subject line reading: “I told Beto ‘HELL NO’ to taking our guns. Now we need to tell Joe Biden.”

Is it any wonder that mass shootings are a uniquely American phenomenon? Is it any wonder that more people are killed in America each year by guns than in most war zones around the world? It is any wonder that more Americans have been killed by guns since 1968 than all US involved wars – combined?

Why does the US have so many shootings?


Focus On Risk Factors Over Motives

“One reason is gun violence is contagious,” argues Dr James Densley, professor of criminal justice at Metropolitan State University and co-founder of the Violence Project.

“One shooting can inspire another. The mass shooting disease is a non-contact, airborne pathogen. It is spread largely by fear and fascination, the blueprint laid down by past shooters, and the desire of new shooters to outdo their predecessors.

“In this sense, everyday gun violence is a blood-borne pathogen. Like an STI, it spreads when people are acculturated to violent scripts that allow for certain risky behaviours — not needle-sharing and unprotected sex but joining gangs and carrying illegal guns.”

Dr Densley rightly notes that, in the 1990s, his home city of Minneapolis was widely dubbed ‘Murderopolis’ because of its high rate of urban homicide, which he described as “so deadly, that the situation felt hopeless” – not unlike the mass shooting crisis facing the country today. Three decades later, Minneapolis has one of the lowest murder rates in the country, which Dr Densley attributes to acknowledging its “contagiousness”.

“First, law enforcement targeted the people most infected,” he said. “Then community organisations, following a public health model, began interrupting the transmission. We have faced the prospect of supposedly unpredictable and intractable violence before, only to find murder is predictable, therefore preventable.”

Similarity, psychiatry professors at the University of Syracuse have warned that the media and politicians must end the ritualisation of gun violence by focusing less on the gunman’s motive and more on the major factors that raise the risk of violence in general – including reducing the likelihood that would-be mass shooters can easily get hold of guns and identifying and reporting observable ‘red flag’ behaviours that point toward imminent, directed violence.

“Notwithstanding the legitimate role of ‘motive,’ we believe that the ritualised hunt for the shooter’s motive is usually an exercise in fruitless speculation and wasted resources,” observe Dr James Knoll and Dr Ronald Pies, both of whom have held the title of editor in chief emeritus at the Psychiatric Times. “When pursued by the media, this quest almost always lacks the necessary data to reach a sound determination. Moreover, these exercises rarely yield any useful or actionable information that would help reduce the likelihood of future mass shootings.”

Clearly, there are a number of workable ways in which the US can resolve its gun violence crisis. But first it must acknowledge that “thoughts and prayers” doesn’t cut it – and nor do Hollywood odes to “good guys with guns”.

This article was amended to correct early reports that the suspect was white.

OUR JOURNALISM RELIES ON YOU

Byline Times is funded by its subscribers. Receive our monthly print edition and help to support fearless, independent journalism.

New to Byline Times? Find out more about us

SUBSCRIBE TO THE PRINT EDITION

A new type of newspaper – independent, fearless, outside the system. Fund a better media.

Don’t miss a story…

Our leading investigations include: empire & the culture warBrexit, crony contractsRussian interferencethe Coronavirus pandemicdemocracy in danger, and the crisis in British journalism. We also introduce new voices of colour in Our Lives Matter.

More stories filed under Werleman's Worldview

More stories filed under Argument

Almost One Million Children Experiencing Poverty in England Denied Free School Meals

, 4 October 2022
As Mayor of London Sadiq Khan demands universal free school meals for primary school children, Natasha Phillips reports on the impact of the cost of living crisis

The Importance of Learning Lessons from the Pandemic as the Cost of Living Crisis Looms Large

, 4 October 2022
With one Government sitting on its hands and another washing its hands of all responsibility, where does that leave Wales? Leader of Plaid Cymru, Adam Price, writes for the Byline Times

Exposing the Conservative Hedge Fund Scandal: Better Late than Never – Or Too Little Too Late?

, 3 October 2022
As Kwasi Kwarteng faces questions over his attendance at a cocktail party with financiers, Byline Times’ Editor Hardeep Matharu asks why this newspaper’s warnings from three years ago about the influence of hedge fund donors in politics were ignored

More from the Byline Family