Today, activists for democracy in the former British colony find themselves with no protests, no opposition law-makers and, soon, without their influential leaders
What a difference a year makes in Hong Kong.
Last November, the city’s streets were filled with pro-democracy protestors. Clashes with police were a regular occurrence, with two of Hong Kong’s international universities key battlegrounds.
Global support was increasing for the pro-democracy push as America passed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act. The movement was resilient and full of hope.
But, on Monday, as high-profile activists Joshua Wong, Agnes Chow and Ivan Lam stood in court facing charges that will likely see them face prison, it summed up a torrid year for Hong Kong’s pro-democracy hopes.
Today, the pro-democracy movement finds itself with no protests, no opposition law-makers and soon to be without its influential activists. Since the implementation by Beijing of the National Security Law in June – which effectively curtails protest and freedom of speech – the political clampdown has gathered pace, severely jeopardising Hong Kong’s unique autonomy.
The people of Hong Kong have lived under a ‘one country, two systems’ agreement since its return to China from Britain in 1997. This allows the city to enjoy its limited democracy until 2047.
Many felt that Beijing has encroached on the agreement. A proposed extradition bill sparked seven months of pro-democracy protests in the city, as further demands followed. Beijing then enacted the National Security Law, which prohibits secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces, and its details can be widely interpreted. It allows dissidents to be arrested more easily, allowing Beijing to reshape the city as it sees fit.
These actions by China have widely been interpreted as violating the ‘one country, two systems’ agreement.
To the international community, Joshua Wong and Agnes Chow have been two of the most prominent faces of Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement, dating back to the Umbrella Movement in 2014. They have garnered international attention for their efforts to shine a light on Hong Kong’s democratic decline.
But, despite their worldwide recognition, they still have to answer to the legal prosecutions against them in Hong Kong.
In June 2019, at Hong Kong’s West Kowloon Magistrates Court, the charges against them and fellow activist Ivan Lam were for unlawful assembly. After receiving legal advice, all three decided to plead guilty. Wong admitted to both “organising and inciting unauthorised assemblies” and could face a maximum five years in jail.
The trio are now in custody and will be sentenced on 2 December. But the writing is on the wall for Hong Kong’s most prominent activists.
“The green uniformed correctional officers, the grey-white iron cells and cells, the big tattooed man with the background of the river, the hard-to-speak-out food, are what I’ve experienced in the past three times in prison, and these are probably my future, again,” Wong said on Sunday.
Agnes Chow, who has never been to jail before, shared her own heartfelt message: “If I am sentenced to prison this time, it will be the first time in my life. I am mentally prepared but I am still a little afraid.”
It is unlikely that these charges will be their last. The only positive – if there are any – is that they fall under Hong Kong’s own Basic Law, which means that the activists will avoid the harsh penalties introduced by the National Security Law, including life imprisonment.
Leung Kwok-hung – also known as ‘Long Hair’ – is a Hong Kong social activist. Speaking outside of the court building, Leung said the charges and pending sentencing was “revenge” as they relate to incidents outside the Hong Kong police headquarters. “I think the whole procedure for the prosecution is a persecution,” he told Byline Times.
