
Read our Monthly Magazine
And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
More than half of Reform UK’s corporate donors are connected to the construction, property and development industries, which would be set benefit from his party’s new housing policies, analysis by Byline Times can reveal.
A cross-analysis of company records and Electoral Commission donations data by Byline Times found that 55% of Reform UK’s corporate donors operate in the property and construction space. Of the 40 companies donating to Reform UK, 22 are involved in such businesses.
The finding lands as Farage repositions announces new housing policies which he claims puts his party as the voice of the white working class. In his first Substack essay, published on 14 June, the Reform leader argued that Britain is a “two tier state against white people” and suggesting that social housing has been redistributed away from the white British families who first occupied it.
His proposed remedy moves foreign nationals out of social housing and into the private rented sector – a market dominated by the landlords and property developers who fund his party, and one its policies would tilt further in their favour.
Reform UK’s corporate donor base includes property developers, construction contractors, plant-hire businesses, commercial landlords, investment companies and firms, all with fortunes closely tied to planning decisions, land values and development activity.
The party has received £5.873 million in corporate donations between 2019 and 2026. Byline Times can confirm that nearly £2.418 million, some 41% of the total value of Reform UK’s corporate donations in this period, is property-related.
These figures cover corporate donors only, and exclude 85 individual donors who have given to Nigel Farage’s party. Reform UK was originally founded as the Brexit Party in November 2018, before officially changing its name in January 2021. All donations to both parties are included in the calculations.
The top five property corporate donors are TISUN Investments Limited (£613,000), E.I.R.P Limited (£295,000), J.C. Bamford Excavators Ltd (£200,000), London AC Ltd (£200,000) and Interior Architecture Landscape Ltd (£200,000).
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
Planning, Housing And Net Zero
This high number of corporate donations from the property and construction industry has to be read in the context of many of Reform UK’s flagship economic policies that could, if the party came to power, directly affect the profitability of those sectors. In its 2024 election programme, Reform pledged to “unleash housebuilding“, introduce a more flexible planning regime for major developments and fast-track housing schemes on brownfield land.
Until recently, Reform’s housing and infrastructure spokesperson was Simon Dudley, who was a prominent advocate of housing deregulation. The former chair of Homes England has argued the “pendulum has just swung too far the wrong way” on building regulations since the Grenfell Tower fire, which killed 72 people in 2017, and has repeatedly called for planning restrictions.
The residents who would bear the consequences of looser building standards are, disproportionately, the working-class tenants of blocks like Grenfell. Perhaps distancing himself from such a position, in April 2026 Nigel Farage sacked Dudley as spokesperson for Reform UK, but Dudley continues to describe himself as such on both LinkedIn and X.
Either way, Reform UK still seems to stand for what it has described as “loose fit” planning policies designed to make it easier for large housing developments to secure building approval. Such changes could significantly reduce planning risk for developers and landowners, but it is unclear how this would benefit new-home buyers or renters.
Farage also blames immigration for housing problems and insists – at least in regard to housing, if not everything else – “foreign nationals must go to the back of the queue”.
Richard Tice, a property developer whose companies have donated some £2.8 million to Reform UK, used a February 2026 speech in Birmingham to pledge a “Great Repeal Bill” scrapping the Renters’ Rights Act. That Act, which took effect in May 2026, ended Section 21 “no fault” evictions and gave private renters in England security of tenure, limits on rent rises and protection from bidding wars. The renters’ campaign group Generation Rent called the pledge to repeal it “a threat levelled at England’s 11 million private renters”.
Farage’s social housing message to working-class voters is that migrants have displaced the people who paid for those homes, which can be solved by moving foreign nationals into the private rented sector. Yet the policies his donors favour would strip protection from that sector, returning to landlords the power of no-fault eviction and adding demand in the tenure where working-class renters compete for homes. Many of those voters rent from private landlords; some of those landlords fund the party.
Reform UK has also repeatedly promised to scrap net-zero policies. In its manifesto it claims energy prices are high as a result of “bad ideological policy”. Their supporters argue that environmental regulation, biodiversity requirements and carbon-reduction targets add costs to major developments. Reform says removing those constraints would reduce costs and accelerate economic growth.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
The Donors And Their Records
Several of the donating companies identified by Byline Times are controlled by directors who have been involved in high-profile controversies, investigations or public disputes.
Among the most prominent is Richard Tice, a director of donor companies including Britain Means Business Ltd and TISUN Investments Ltd. Tice built his career in property development and has become one of the country’s most vocal opponents of net-zero policies. He has repeatedly questioned mainstream climate science and the scientific consensus on human-driven climate change.
Another company of Tice’s – Quidnet RITE Limited – has recently been at the centre of another scandal where it was claimed he did not correctly pay £91,000 in dividend tax. Dismissing the Sunday Times exposé, Tice posted a lengthy statement on X, saying: “A long career with multiple businesses is bound to feature some errors. Naturally I am always happy to put things right and if numbers need rechecking, of course I will pay what is owed – be that more or less.”
“I have always paid everything that I was advised to pay,” Tice wrote.
The Reform UK donor network also includes companies linked to the Bamford family, owners of construction equipment giant JCB. Lady Carole Bamford, Lord Anthony Bamford and Mark Bamford have all been associated with businesses that have donated to right-wing political causes. JCB has donated £200,000 to Reform.
JCB has faced sustained criticism from human-rights organisations over allegations its machinery was used in demolitions in the occupied Palestinian territories. Lawyers acting for Palestinian groups have sought international investigations into the use of the equipment. JCB has denied wrongdoing and said it expects distributors and customers to comply with applicable laws.
Separately, the Bamford family’s offshore financial arrangements and tax structures have been the subject of tax investigations, with a “complex network of offshore tax havens and companies”, although no wrongdoing has been established against the individuals concerned.
Another donor is the property investment company R20 Advisory, which has Robert Tchenguiz among its directors. Tchenguiz was one of the most high-profile figures caught up in the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) investigation into the collapse of Icelandic bank Kaupthing. He was arrested in 2011 before the case collapsed amid serious errors by investigators. No charges were ever brought and the SFO later paid substantial damages to Tchenguiz.
Today, according to Companies House, the accounts for R20 Advisory stand overdue. While this does not necessarily make the £100,000 donation accepted by Reform UK in June 2025 unlawful, the company’s limited public profile, its location in the British Virgin Islands, and its overdue filings raise concerns.
Another donor-linked figure is Marc Joseph Meyohas of Greybull Capital. Greybull donated £100,000 to Reform UK and became a focus of national controversy following the collapse of British Steel in 2019. Trade unions, MPs and former employees accused the private-equity firm of failing to secure the long-term future of the company while benefiting financially from its ownership. Greybull rejected those criticisms and argued that global market conditions were responsible for the collapse. Nevertheless, the failure of British Steel remains one of the most politically sensitive industrial collapses of recent years.
Another director of a Reform UK corporate donor is Francis Anthony Keenan of FK Building Ltd. His company donated £100,000. Several companies within the FK Group entered administration in 2026 after facing mounting financial pressures, resulting in redundancies and the restructuring of parts of the business. FK Group, FK Construction and FK Facades all folded.
Sotheby’s International Realty donated £100,000 to Reform in August 2025. Grigori Azar, a director linked to the luxury property estate agent, was reported on in a 2026 investigation relating to allegations of historic sexual misconduct and other concerns. Azar has been accused of allegedly waving a bottle of champagne in front of a female colleague 20 years his junior, while questioning her about the amount of sex she was having, making remarks about her body and allegedly saying he wanted to perform sex acts with another female colleague who was not there.
Don’t miss a story
These claims – detailed in the report by Bloomberg – remain allegations and do not constitute findings of wrongdoing. Sotheby’s said “the CEO has no recollection” of some of the allegations listed by the news service. Azar, via his libel lawyer, refused to offer comment to Byline Times about the sexual misconduct allegations beyond what he had told Bloomberg.
David Alan Haythornthwaite, who is connected to Tangerine Holdings and whose company donated £100,000 to Reform UK, was involved in a high-profile dispute with the University of Lancashire in 2025. Haythornthwaite criticised what he described as the university’s focus on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives at the opening of its new veterinary school, arguing that the institution should prioritise excellence in veterinary education.
Following an internal email in which he was accused of racism, Haythornthwaite brought a defamation claim against the university. In February 2026, the University of Lancashire issued an unreserved apology, accepted that the allegations were “wrong and unfounded”, and agreed to pay £32,000 in compensation, which he donated to a charity of his choosing, along with his legal costs.
The Climate-Sceptic Backers
Andrew Perloff, chairman of property investment company Panther Securities, has repeatedly attracted attention for outspoken comments on climate policy and environmental activism. Panther Securities donated £70,000 to Reform UK. Perloff has criticised climate campaigners and questioned aspects of the UK’s net-zero agenda, positions that align closely with Reform UK’s own policy platform.
First Corporate Consultants Limited, a company owned by Terrance Mordaunt, has been one of Reform’s largest corporate donors, donating some £230,000. Mordaunt, owner of the Bristol Port Company, was the chairman of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a climate-sceptic think tank, questioning British policies on climate action.
Donations And Policy
Across these donors, there is no evidence that any company or individual has acted improperly, or that Reform UK’s policies have been designed to benefit particular companies should the party take power.
Political parties routinely receive support from businesses with commercial interests that align with their policy positions.
However, the concentration of donors from construction, property and development is especially notable given the party’s commitment to repealing existing legislation that protects renters from landlords and the wider removal of environmental constraints on development.
The Green Party leader, Zack Polanski, said that “Reform hoovering up vast sums of private donations isn’t a sign of political strength, but a sign of a weakness in the foundations of our democracy…and tilts the entire system towards the interests of those elites”.
If Reform were ever to exercise power nationally, its decisions on planning rules, environmental regulation, infrastructure investment and development policy would directly benefit many of the companies and sectors that currently fund the party.
Byline Times approached Reform UK, R20 Advisory and Richard Tice for comment. None had responded by the time of publication.


