Free from fear or favour
No tracking. No cookies

Keir Starmer’s Government Will Keep Voter ID, Despite Thousands Turned Away From Polls

The Democracy Minister said scrapping the system, introduced by Boris Johnson’s Government is “not on the table”

Democracy minister Rushanara Ali MP

Byline Times is an independent, reader-funded investigative newspaper, outside of the system of the established press, reporting on ‘what the papers don’t say’ – without fear or favour.

To support its work, subscribe to the monthly Byline Times print edition, packed with exclusive investigations, news, and analysis.

Scrapping compulsory voter ID for UK elections is “not on the table”, according to Keir Starmer’s democracy minister Rushanara Ali.      

The minister’s comments come despite over 16,000 people being turned away and denied a vote at last year’s Westminster election due to not possessing the right kind of identification. This compares to just one conviction for in person voter fraud in the year of the 2019 general election.

The Government is currently reviewing Voter ID, which was introduced by the last Conservative Government to stern opposition from democracy groups. 

Campaigners have held out hope that ministers could abandon the restrictions.

However, asked on Tuesday if the removal of voter ID was “on the table”, Ali told MPs: “No, it’s not. What we are focused on is improving the system and making sure that we look at what else we can do in relation to voter ID, and getting those legitimate voters who are excluded included.” 

ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE

Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.

We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.

Her comments to the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee contradict media reports in January – particularly from the Telegraph – that the Government was considering scrapping voter ID altogether. 

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner had told MPs then: “In all of the reports that we’ve had in the past, in terms of electoral fraud [it] is very, very, very, very minor…And, therefore, we want to enfranchise people into exercising their vote and we’ll look at voter ID as part of that.”

This week’s committee hearing followed up the Electoral Commission’s recent report on the introduction of voter ID, which highlighted ‘a number of significant improvements necessary to support participation and trust in future elections’.

Kemi Badenoch Ditches Net Zero Target After Taking Donations From Funders of Tufton Street Climate Denial Group

The Conservative leader and her Shadow Net Zero Secretary took funding from key backers of lobby groups campaigning to curb action against climate change

Minister Ali also told MPs that electoral reform – i.e. changing the voting system – was “not a priority” for the Labour Government. She referred repeatedly to the 2011 referendum under the Conservative/Lib Dem coalition Government, on the Alternative Vote, which is not a proportional voting system and was widely viewed as a fudge. 

But she said the Government was nonetheless “absolutely committed to strengthening our democracy, encouraging full participation in our elections, and ensuring all eligible electors have a voice and people’s views are fairly represented.”

“We’re working closely with the Electoral Commission and stakeholders across the sector to deliver upon our priorities, to improve registration, extend voting rights for all UK elections to 16 and 17 year olds, ensure we have appropriate voter ID rules, and strengthen the political finance framework,” she added.

PACAC scrutinises the spending, policies and administration of the Cabinet Office, which oversees election policy and administration.  


Subscribers Get More from JOSIAH

Josiah Mortimer also writes the On the Ground column, exclusive to the print edition of Byline Times.

So for more from him…


Written by

This article was filed under
, ,