Subscriptions
Read our Monthly Magazine
And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
“Nations would be terrified if they knew by what small men they were governed” – Talleyrand
About fifteen years ago, in late Autumn 2010, I was contacted by a young high-ranking Russian diplomat in London, Sergey Nalobin. He was extremely interested that I was helping Conservative Party Treasurers to recruit future financial political donors, and stated that he could help with that. “I know Russian companies that would like to contribute to the Conservative Party”, he told me.
For me, this was a massive red flag and potentially a serious criminal offence. I warned the Security Services (MI5) but they refused my offer to collect proof of Nalobin’s proposed criminal activities and, instead, allowed him to remain en poste in London for a further few years. Eventually, this Russian diplomat was gently pushed out of the country by the Foreign Office, although not without causing yet another controversy, but that’s another story.
When Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) was finally allowed to publish its Russia Report in 2020, it unleashed fierce criticism at MI5 for “actively avoiding looking for evidence that Russia interfered in our democracy”. It then dawned upon me that my encounter with Nalobin could have been an important illustration of that, and I wrote to my old friend in the parliamentary Conservative Party, and Chairman of the ISC at the time, The Rt Hon Sir Julian Lewis MP for advice. I was told to go to the Police.
Donate to help Project Citizen cover their rising legal costs for this important follow-up to the Russia Report
Special Branch
Of course walking into a police station with a report about MI5, and expecting to be taken seriously is not as straightforward as it may sound. However, I got talking to SO15 (formerly the Special Branch) of the Metropolitan Police, who also deal with foreign espionage and eventually began to feel that I was being listened to. However, my optimism was short-lived.
On a cold January evening in 2022, just a few weeks before the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, at a London railway station, a plain clothes police officer handed me a letter from a Detective Superintendent at SO15. The letter basically stated that MI5’s refusal to investigate possible activity of a foreign diplomat did not, in their view, amount to a criminal offence. I was advised that “the proper forum for [my] complaint would be the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT)”. The letter was dated 5 May 2021, about 8 months previously, and bore an incorrect postcode. I was left with a distinct feeling that the Police were stalling.
As I was planning to write and send my complaint to the IPT securely, the Russians attacked Ukraine on 24 February 2022. My family, like so many other families caught up on different sides in any war, was broken. My mother, my father and my half-sister had become completely brainwashed by Russian propaganda. As Putin banned and expelled all independent media from the country, my mother believed what she was told by the Federal TV. Things got so bad that she refused to believe anything I was trying to explain to her, and eventually she refused to talk to me for more than a year. 2022 was a terrible year and spending my time making yet another complaint about Nalobin did not seem to be a priority.
But eventually I got round to it in November that year, after receiving a call from Channel 4’s Dispatches, asking for an interview about Nalobin. My story seemed important again.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
Intelligence Tribunal
The response from the Tribunal arrived a mere three months later. The IPT refused to investigate my complaint about MI5’s refusal to investigate Mr Nalobin, with no right of appeal. It justified its decision by my complaint being, apparently, “out of time” as the IPT, under its current statute, does not have to consider events that took place over a year ago.
While the Tribunal had discretion to waive that requirement, apparently it was not satisfied with my explanation that I “was unaware of the significance of the event until the publication, in July 2020, of the Russia Report”.
Additionally, the Tribunal stated that it had turned down my complaint because “there [was] also no explanation as to why the complainant did not receive the letter dated 5 May 2021 until sometime in 2022. We note that it is addressed to the complainant at the same address given in the complaint form. The complainant has not explained who handed him the letter or when, other than it was “earlier this year””.
Clearly, if the IPT really wanted to know the answer to the last question then it could have obtained it from the Police. Their first point about the Russia Report sounded as an empty excuse. The whole thing stank to me of whitewash.
It also seemed, from the irritated tone of the IPT decision, which sounded like a cantankerous elderly aunt just woken from her afternoon nap by a noisy child, that the presiding Judge really did not want to be drawn on such controversies, even if both the Police and the ISC thought the Tribunal was the correct avenue for the resolution of my concerns.
A thriller BY PROJECT CITIZEN, featuring Carole Cadwalladr, Peter Jukes and Sergei Cristo that exposes an alleged secret spy ring operating at the very heart of the British establishment
Sergei and the Westminster Spy Ring
It was around this time that Carole Cadwalladr, the investigative journalist with the Guardian and Observer, involved me in the recoding of this chart-topping podcast. And it was during my trips to London to be interviewed for various episodes that I probably learnt more about the significance of my experience of the Russian interference, as I was being prompted by this brilliant podcast. I talked to my friends in the Conservative Party, Parliament, government, journalism and diplomacy. Most of the answers seemed to point back to the Russia Report.
The Russia Report
There were several intriguing discoveries. First, that Conservative members of the ISC knew the reason why Prime Minister Johnson came up with bogus excuses to prevent the publication of the Russia Report before the 2019 Election. He was afraid that the controversy around the Russian interference would derail his campaign to “get Brexit done”, and might have even ended up in the courts.
Second, that the Report was massively redacted. I was told that it goes to the other four of the “Five Eyes” intelligence agencies, who take out anything that they believe came from their sources. That meant that we would not have had the chance to see any American information, which was a pity because US agencies clearly keep a close eye on us. Once a credible source in the US told me that, when Cameron was PM, the CIA tipped the British several times over the so-called “suspicious” deaths of Russians in the UK, but London dismissed them.
Third, that Johnson wanted Grayling to take over the ISC not only to soft pedal the release of the Russia Report and how it was presented to the public, but also to destroy the Committee’s independence, remove part of its funding and fire key expert personnel. Other than that, Grayling had no interest in being on the Committee – he left soon after he lost the election as Chairman to Julian Lewis.
Fourth, I confirmed my suspicions that the relationship between the Committee and the intelligence and security services, which it is supposed to oversee, and the rest of the Executive, has been a constant struggle. In its annual reports, the ISC complained about the Services failing to answer their requests in time, if at all. The PM has not made himself available to the Committee, as it used to be the case, for several years. Apart from complaining about all this in their reports, the Committee, which represented us, the electorate, could not really do anything to force the executive to take their responsibilities before Parliament seriously. In the meantime, the Committee sits firmly within the Cabinet Office structure, with its every move carefully monitored by the Executive. Indeed the Committee can’t even publish a fully redacted report without asking the Prime Minister for permission.
From Z to X: How Russian Information Warfare Primed the World for Trump and Musk
“Money and information are the twin tactical nukes of modern politics” according to Steve Bannon. But the the seeds for this tech dystopia were sown more than a decade ago
Smoke and Mirrors from Boris Johnson
The Report was published in July 2020, soon after that exhilarating feat of multi-party collaboration, so unlike the confrontational nature of British politics, as members of different political parties wrestled ISC’s independence back from Mr Johnson at No 10.
In its pages it hid a startling revelation: our excellent intelligence and security agencies did not see