Byline Times is an independent, reader-funded investigative newspaper, outside of the system of the established press, reporting on ‘what the papers don’t say’ – without fear or favour.
To support its work, subscribe to the monthly Byline Times print edition, packed with exclusive investigations, news, and analysis.
Although I have photographed, filmed and written about many demonstrations and actions over the years, in order to avoid critics or readers questioning whether my reports were influenced by personal beliefs rather than facts, in the past I have resisted the temptation to take part in protests myself.
More recently, however, the systematic failure of governments and world leaders to effectively tackle the climate crisis and biodiversity loss and the severe sentences handed out to climate activists by the UK judiciary system has forced me to question this approach.
As a result, in September 2024, I found myself being arrested alongside fellow Greenpeace activists for blockading Unilever’s London HQ to highlight the company’s role in plastic pollution.

Once I had decided to take part in a protest it was easy to justify joining the Unilever action.
Plastic pollution is out of control globally and an investigation in 2023 by Greenpeace International exposed Unilever as the largest corporate seller of single-use plastic sachets, selling a staggering 1,700 a second.
The demonstration was part of an ongoing campaign coordinated by Greenpeace offices across the world urging Unilever to end the sale of plastic sachets by the end of 2025 and to phase out all single-use plastics within a decade.
By all accounts, the action was successful. Unilever clearly did not enjoy the negative publicity and is now actively engaging with Greenpeace on how it can use its considerable influence to push for a strong Global Plastic Treaty that includes reducing plastic production.
But for me, the act of civil disobedience was not just about environmental advocacy; it was also a stand against the increasing erosion of a fundamental pillar of democracy – our right to protest.
The right to protest is a cornerstone of democracy, enabling citizens to express dissent, advocate for change, and hold power to account. But legislative changes brought in by the last Conservative Government, granting the police broader powers to suppress demonstrations deemed disruptive, have imposed severe restrictions on this freedom.
Of the 35 protesters arrested during the Unilever action, 27 of us were charged with “locking on”, a tactic involving physically attaching oneself to an object or location to prevent removal and a new offence introduced under The Public Order Act 2023 (POA 2023). If convicted we faced unlimited fines and/or up to six months imprisonment.
POA 2023 also included new stop-and-search powers for police in England and Wales, focusing specifically on protest-related activities.
Interfering with the construction or maintenance of major transport projects, such as HS2, now carries a penalty of up to six months’ imprisonment, a fine, or both. And actions that obstruct or significantly delay the operation of essential services, including roads, railways, and power stations, are today punishable by up to 12 months’ imprisonment.
The clamp down on peaceful protest in the UK, under the guise of maintaining public order, not only undermines democratic principles but also deters individuals from participating in activism due to fear of legal repercussions.
In March 2023, the UK was downgraded in an influential Civil Freedoms Index, putting it in the same category as countries like Hungary and South Africa. Previously it had shared a category with France, Germany and other European countries.
Civicus, which compiles the index, said the UK Government was creating a “hostile environment” towards campaigners and civil society.
Michel Forst, a UN rapporteur, has called the UK’s treatment of environmental protesters “terrifying” as arrests, according to a report recently published by the University of Bristol, occur at three times the global average.
Statistics from Just Stop Oil reported by The Guardian and confirmed by Scotland Yard show that the police arrested 630 climate protesters over a period of just four weeks in late 2023.
Whilst reporting for Byline Times at Southwark Crown Court last July, I watched with disbelief as Roger Hallam, co-founder of Extinction Rebellion (XR) and Just Stop Oil (JSO), and his four co-defendants were sentenced to a total of 21 years imprisonment for conspiring to block traffic on the M25 motorway.
During the trial and sentencing, Judge Hehir branded the climate activists as “eco-zealots” and repeatedly shut down any attempt to explain their climate-related motives for taking such action.
It was also clear that they were being made an example of in order to intimidate other potential climate activists and discourage them from taking part in future actions.
However, the judge’s obvious scare tactics had the opposite effect on me. His attempt at silencing the ever-growing number of ordinary people wanting to protest about the climate crisis and biodiversity loss is what finally convinced me to take action.
In early January 2025, just days before our trials were due to begin, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) dropped all charges, citing insufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction.
While this outcome was a relief, the initial charges and the existence of such restrictive laws highlight the troubling shift in how the state perceives and handles peaceful protest which, despite calls from the human rights charity Liberty and Greenpeace to do so, the Government shows no sign of reversing.
Whilst in opposition, the Labour Party opposed POA 2023 during its progression through Parliament. However, since taking office, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has taken no steps to amend or repeal the legislation.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
Similarly, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has disregarded repeated requests for meetings with organisations such as Greenpeace and Amnesty.
As leader of a party traditionally aligned with protecting individual rights and promoting social justice, Starmer, by rights, should be championing the protection of the right to peaceful protest. However, it is evident that any Labour MPs seeking to have POA 2023 withdrawn from the statute books will need to push hard to have any chance of success.
But despite the worrying number of activists currently serving long sentences for peaceful protest – 40 at last count – and Labour’s apparent refusal to repeal POA 2023, I have no doubt that activists and campaigners across the UK will not be deterred and will continue to devise innovative ways to raise awareness and drive urgent change towards a sustainable future for people and planet alike.