Byline Times is an independent, reader-funded investigative newspaper, outside of the system of the established press, reporting on ‘what the papers don’t say’ – without fear or favour.
To support its work, subscribe to the monthly Byline Times print edition, packed with exclusive investigations, news, and analysis.
Brits tell pollsters they are against high immigration — but they also favour a youth mobility deal with the European Union and want to join the EU single market even if it means accepting the free movement of persons.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s recently elected Labour Government is unpopular and the UK economy is flatlining, so, could joining the EU single market be Labour’s new signature policy?
Maybe, but it’s not straightforward.

The EU/UK post-Brexit Trade and Cooperation Agreement provides for review of its trade provisions in 2025. The EU and the UK are limbering up for negotiations.
Starmer insists former Conservative PM Boris Johnson “botched” the existing trade deal and that he could do better. But Starmer has ruled out joining the EU, customs union or single market, and rejects the free movement of persons.
After a string of political own goals Starmer’s Government has seen its popularity nose-dive. The UK’s predominantly Conservative press have had a field day. Even insiders fear that Labour may be destined to be a one-term Government.
In the run-up to the General Election Labour painted itself into a corner over the taxes they would raise to put the public finances in order. The promised reset with the EU looks likely to be going the same way because Starmer has ruled out the closer links with the EU which most Brits and the EU seem to want.
Starmer Wants a Food Standards Deal, but It Would Have Strings Attached
Starmer wants a UK/EU deal on food standards, to reverse the decline in UK food exports to the EU that has followed Brexit. But the EU will only accept that if the UK aligns with EU rules and accepts the oversight of EU judges.
Other must-haves on the Brussels side are a youth mobility scheme and maintaining current levels of EU access to UK fishing grounds.
Starmer has not ruled out a role for the EU Courts in a food standards deal, but he has so far rejected a youth mobility scheme because it would cross his red line on free movement. Polling suggests that 59% of Brits favour the EU’s proposal on youth mobility, despite 68% thinking that immigration is too high.
Accepting EU demands on fishing could be tricky for Starmer. Any concessions on fish would be bad political news at home but concessions on Scottish fish would be particularly bad, with recent polling on Scottish independence showing those in favour three points ahead at 50%.
Starmer’s Red Lines on European Links Could Be Allowed to Fade Over This Parliament
Adding preliminary talks on a UK/EU single market deal to the UK/EU reset negotiations on food standards, youth mobility etc, would match what pollsters tell us most Brits want to hear and hearten the British business community. It could also give a political reboot to the reset negotiations.
Starmer has no current electoral mandate to take the UK into the single market or say yes to freedom of movement. But that need not rule out UK and EU trade negotiators exploring an outline single market agreement (SMA) for the longer term while they hammer out a food standards agreement in the medium term.

Talks on an SMA could clash with talks on a US trade agreement (chlorinated chicken etc) — but so could the deal on food standards Starmer is keen to strike.
SMA talks would also rub Donald Trump up the wrong way temperamentally — he loathes the EU.
That argues for the EU and the UK proceeding with caution because they both want to dodge the tariffs Trump is threatening to impose on friend and foe alike.
Starmer wants close trade links with both the EU and the US and that will mean a lot of political and diplomatic juggling and some risk-taking too.
Musk and Trump are stalking Starmer on social media like playground bullies, and putting too many eggs in the US basket would not be wise.
The Main Objection to a Single Market Agreement From the UK’s Point of View Is a Democratic One
An SMA would require the UK to apply new EU single market laws without having a say in their content.
Starmer is on record as saying “…we will not be a rule-taker. The rules and laws of this country will be made in parliament according to the national interest.” The present writer has argued that Starmer is right on this.
EU law single market laws cannot be dismissed as technical trade rules nobody cares about — some regulate subject matter of political and economic importance, such as take-overs and mergers, financial services, and the rights of patients to receive health care in other EU countries if their own health services can’t cope.
Most Brits Seem Willing to Accept the Trade-off Between Economic Advantage and Democratic Control
Polls show absolute majorities for the UK joining the single market, accepting that that involves the free movement of persons.
Even those intending to vote for Reform UK, Nigel Farage’s populist right-wing party aiming to replace the Conservatives, split 44%/45% when asked if they would accept the free movement of persons if the UK could regain special access to the European market.
What if Parliament Could Block New Rules and Trigger a Speedy Exit?
The democratic deficit of an SMA might be overcome if all EU rules applied in the UK had been approved by the UK Parliament, and if Parliament could trigger a speedy exit from the SMA if the EU adopted laws the UK could not possibly accept.
The SMA, including those EU laws to be applied by the UK, would enter into force under an Act of Parliament, and replace most of the current UK/EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA).
The UK Parliament would periodically consider new single market rules, and vote on them as a package. If Parliament accepted the package, the new EU rules would be applied in the UK. If Parliament rejected the package, the SMA would terminate in one year and the provisions of the TCA displaced by it would revive.
The UK and the EU could terminate anyway if they gave one year’s notice — that is the position in the EU/EFTA Agreement under which Norway et al. participate in the EU single market.
Terms of withdrawal, such as residence rights of migrants, and payment of outstanding financial contributions, could be agreed in advance and set out in the SMA.
In practice, the UK would be unlikely to terminate the SMA because of objections to a specific piece of EU legislation, because of the damage it would do to UK trade with the EU.
The UK Could Still Make Its Own Trade Agreements
A single market agreement would not include a customs union, so there would still be customs checks and paperwork on UK/EU trade, though the UK accepting single market rules could simplify some of these, as Starmer’s quest for a food standards agreement demonstrates.
The UK could keep its existing trade agreements with countries around the world (such as those with Canada, Japan, Australia and New Zealand), and continue to make new ones, providing it maintained single market standards for all sales in the UK.
The combination of single market membership and an independent trade policy might be the right mix for the UK.
An outline SMA agreed, or in the process of being agreed, by UK/EU trade negotiators would have no legal effects in this Parliament, so none of Starmer’s red lines would be crossed. But preparatory talks in this Parliament could be continued, or turned into a binding treaty in the next.
A Referendum Would Be an Option
If the SMA model were taken forward, no popular vote beyond that involved in the next General Election would be needed, though it would be an option.
A referendum to approve an SMA could undermine the “speedy exit” model because it would create a political expectation that a referendum would also be needed to confirm withdrawal, though voters and politicians might prefer that.
Starmer’s special advisers should be running policies like this past Labour’s focus groups in advance of and during the upcoming trade talks with the EU, to keep in touch with what voters want.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
There would be risks for Labour in exploring an SMA agreement with the EU. Reaching even an outline agreement might not work out, or voters might cool on the idea as they learned more. But there are also risks in more of the same until 2029.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained.