Outside the system

Labour Government Urged to End ‘Do As I Say, Not As I Do’ Attitude of Conservatives to Help Reverse Global Shift Towards Authoritarianism  

Campaigners call on Keir Starmer to stop the ongoing erosion of civic space in the UK

Police try and move on a protester during a Youth Demand march in support of Palestine on 1 June in London. Photo: Andrea Domeniconi / Alamy
Police try and move on a protestor during a Youth Demand march in support of Palestine on 1 June in London. Photo: Andrea Domeniconi/Alamy

Read Our Monthly Magazine

And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system

During the past decade, previous UK Governments have eroded the rights and infrastructure that civil society requires to thrive.

They have curbed protest rights, meddled in the independence of regulators, and attacked charities for being ‘too political’ as part of wider efforts to limit scrutiny, quieten dissent, and polarise public debate. It is no wonder that relations between government and civil society are at rock bottom.   

In the Labour Party manifesto, Keir Starmer committed to working in partnership with civil society. And while the promise of the new Culture Secretary to end the Conservative ‘culture wars’ is also welcome, the new Government will need to do more than that if it wants to create an environment that enables the whole of civil society to flourish.   

Prime Minister Keir Starmer leaves 10 Downing Street ahead of the State Opening of Parliament on 17 July. Photo: ZUMA Press, Inc/ Alamy

The introduction of draconian public order legislation, the detention of protestors, and the vilification of campaigners led the global civil society and human rights monitoring group, CIVICUS, to downgrade civic space in the UK from “narrowed” to “obstructed” last March 2023 – placing the country in the same category as countries such as El Salvador, Hungary, and South Africa.

Since then, there has been a further decline – as highlighted in Bond’s first annual civic space review. The prison sentences given to five protestors last week also indicate how restrictions are continuing to have an impact despite the recent change in government.


What Is ‘Civic Space’? 

The term ‘civic space’ means little to most people, but it is integral to any well-functioning democracy. Restrictions on civic space are often an early indicator of a shift towards authoritarianism.  

Civic space refers to the environment within which the people and organisations that make up civil society exist and are able to exercise their rights.   

‘Labour Needs to Arrest UK’s Authoritarian Slide, Reinforce our Democracy and Repair the Damage’

The Britain Labour has inherited is a far less free country than it was just a few years ago, and reversing the slide toward authoritarianism will require a committed and concerted effort

An open civic space has laws and government policies which uphold democratic rights and freedoms, fair and independent regulators, an open and inclusive political sphere that supports engagement in policy-making, public debate and campaigning, and access to sustainable funding for civil society organisations.  

In civic spaces that are constrained, there may be restrictions on public assemblies, attacks on protestors and activists, limits on access to funding, or political interference in the work of regulators, the media, or the courts. 

CIVICUS reports that just two per cent of the world’s population currently live in countries in which civic space is ranked as ‘open’, while more than 70% live in ‘closed’ or ‘repressed’ societies.  


Civic Space in the UK 

Strong language against democratic backsliding in other countries has been a consistent feature of UK foreign policy – but the country’s criticism of others has been undermined by actions here at home.

For too long, a tendency towards ‘British exceptionalism’ has lent itself to the notion that ‘these things happen elsewhere’ and that the UK is somewhat immune to the global democratic tilt towards authoritarianism. But this is not the case.  

From a lone social media post by a public figure, to the passing of new draconian laws – seven key trends are driving the ongoing erosion of civic space in the UK. 

These range from an increased focus on preventing protests that cause disruption, as opposed to disorder, barring protestors from citing their motives as part of their defence in court, to tone-policing charity campaigns, and the vetting and banning of experts from engaging with government.  

‘Lord Walney Wants to Stop the Public From Acquitting Protesters – to Safeguard Those Making Money From the Issues They Demonstrate Against’

He wants juries to stop finding defendants not guilty and to prevent judges from applying laws “differently” when they involve issues like climate change and anti-racism

Additionally, broadening the definition of ‘extremism’ has restricted certain organisations from meeting with government officials and parliamentarians and from receiving public funds.

Key events over the past 18 months embodying these downward trends include: the passing into law of the Public Order Act and the first convictions of protestors under the new legislation; the arrest of a woman for holding a placard outside court that reminded jurors in a protest-related trial that they had a right to act according to their consciences; an established nature charity hitting the headlines for calling three former government ministers “liars”; the former Home Secretary publicly attacking migrants rights charities at the Conservative Party Conference; and the jailing of five protestors for planning to peacefully protest on the M25.  

Although there have been some positive developments in this time period – such as Greta Thunberg and fellow climate protestors being cleared of all charges, and Arts Council England affirming that it would not withdraw funding from politically-engaged organisations – the overall decline in UK civic space continues more than a year after it was downgraded by international experts.

The new Government has an opportunity to reverse this trend, repair the damage done during the past decade, and send a strong international message about supporting civil society and protecting human rights.