
Read our Monthly Magazine
And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
Manchester Metropolitan University has been criticised for allowing invasive ground investigation surveys which could disturb or even destroy active birds’ nests and involve heavy machinery working “too close” to vulnerable protected species during the breeding season.
According to locals, Ryebank Fields in south Manchester is a rewilded oasis for urban wildlife, a much loved resource for the local community and a valuable carbon sink.
But once planning permission has been granted, the university (MMU), which ranks as the seventh best University for Biological Sciences in the UK, plans to sell the land to its preferred developers, Step Places and Southway Housing, who will clear the 10-acre site to make way for 120 new homes.

A website set up to promote the Ryebank housing development and a letter sent to residents said the works, which are due to start imminently and are expected to last up to six weeks, will include driving steel tubes into the ground, drilling bore holes, digging trial pits and dropping weights on to steel rods buried up to 6m in the ground. Potential bird nesting habitat will also be cleared from various locations around the site to allow access for heavy machinery and survey equipment.
All wild birds and their nests are protected by law under the 1981 Wildlife and Countryside Act.
MMU, Step Places and Southway Housing refused to comment directly to Byline Times, and replied via PR company Lexington Communications, which said “no active bird nests have been recorded on site to date”.
However, during a short walk just after dawn earlier this week ten species of bird were recorded singing and defending breeding territories. Professional ecologists volunteering free of charge for Friends of Ryebank Fields, a campaign group set up to save the site from development, say that they have strong evidence that there are active nests in the area which would be disturbed or destroyed by the works.
In England, developers are required to either set up exclusion zones for machinery and activities that could harm or disturb protected species or apply for a license from Natural England (NE), the Government body tasked with promoting nature conservation and protecting biodiversity, to allow activities that would otherwise be illegal.
The PR firm confirmed that although NE had not issued any licenses to legally allow disturbance of protected species on the site, “all exclusion zones will be applied and respected when the site investigation works are carried out”.
Images and footage seen by Byline Times of similar works commissioned by MMU at Ryebank Fields in 2019 shows heavy machinery working inside the recommended protected species exclusion zones. Other images show core samples, some of which were later found to be contaminated with asbestos, littering the site after contractors left.
Sam Easterby-Smith, Green Party parliamentary candidate for Manchester Withington in the forthcoming general election, knows Ryebank Fields well and is adamant that the ground surveys should be carried out in full compliance of environmental regulations and best practice.
“Any vegetation works and clearance should certainly be avoided during the official bird nesting season from February to August. It would be extremely disappointing if they were to fail in their environmental duties,” he said, adding: “While I absolutely recognise the need for more housing, particularly affordable housing, there are other, more appropriate sites nearby.”
Councillor Richard Kilpatrick, parliamentary candidate for the Liberal Democrats, said if contractors are ignoring protected species exclusion zones, “this is a serious act of environmental vandalism, the type of which we were given cast-iron guarantees would not happen on this site”.
Kilpatrick also expressed his concern that the work was happening at the wrong time of the year for nesting birds and is likely to disturb contaminated land.
After 14 years of successive Conservative Governments failing to address biodiversity loss, the 2023 State of Nature report, a collaboration between environmental NGOs, academic institutions and government agencies including Natural England, concluded that the UK is now one of the most nature depleted countries in the world.
However, the protection of sites like Ryebank Fields, where many of the “at risk” species highlighted in the State of Nature report, such as birds, amphibians and reptiles and land mammals can be found, has often been labelled as standing in the way of progress by successive Conservative Governments.
Ex Conservative Prime Ministers, Boris Johnson and Liz Truss both consistently sided with developers and were criticised by environmental groups for promising to water down wildlife legislation designed to protect the environment in order to “stream lin



