Subscriptions
Read Our Monthly Magazine
And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
It would be the rosette that did for Rishi Sunak. After all the court intrigue, the WhatsApp groups, the 1922 letters and the media briefings, the commentators were now convinced it would be the errant blue rosette that newly elected Conservative mayor Ben Houchen ‘couldn’t find’ at the count that spelled doom for the Prime Minister.
The commentators may well be right that Houchen made a political calculation and distanced himself from his Westminster colleagues. But if anything, the attention this provoked points to a deeper irony: for the national media, everything orbits around Westminster, including attempts to escape that orbit and see politics through the prism of place.
In attending to local politics only for what it says about the ‘real’ centre of power, many (London-based) journalists masterfully manage to miss the message from the rest of the country: it’s not all about you.
For a start, it’s easy to miss the parallels to other English places.
Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, has built a similarly independent brand. The cover of his manifesto features a prominent profile picture and his name front and centre, with the smallest type reserved for the Labour logo, squeezed at the bottom.
The former Conservative Mayor of the West Midlands, Andy Street, also sought to strike a place and person-based approach, leaning less on party ideology and more on his long track record in business. His colour branding – green and purple – veered away from the traditional Conservative blue. It is no small irony that Street came so close to re-election, but is understood to have been scuppered by the unpopularity of the party of which he remains, sometimes incongruously, a part.
Much has been made of the joint Andys’ positive relationship with one another – and their shared analysis that puts ‘party before place’. Beyond a focus on the person behind the rosette, this also gives the candidates more flexibility to bend beyond the tight confines of their parties.
When politicians are asked to take big political decisions beyond the halls of Westminster, they’re finding that, more often than not, associations with party brands are an obstacle to their work, both while in office and during elections. Political parties are ancient, worn brands which might work for those voters keen to pay as little heed to politics as possible, but may themselves contribute to that apathy. And for more engaged citizens, the story of UK politics over the past few decades is one of churn. Recall a series of votes that, whatever their outcomes, point to a general, sustained and deafening dissatisfaction with politics.
Much of this is down to our voting system – a clunky machine that stifles voter expression and frustrates the majority. Big parties are the electoral winners, but lose out more subtly; their desperate attempts to hold together broad churches, rather than allowing for our pluralist preferences to find representation, keeps the UK electorate locked into an unhappy marriage with the duopoly.
The Local Election Results Flush the Conservative Party’s Culture War Strategy Down the Gender Neutral Toilet
The Conservative party’s strategy of trying to win the general election through a mixture of ‘culture wars and the trans debate’ is only worsening their defeats to Labour
Despite electoral impotence under First Past the Post it is striking – even moving – how many voters come election time still vote with their heart, for smaller parties who haven’t got a chance. So the two largest parties slug it out, corralling their large, diverse coalition under pain of deselection and hoping to play the margins and fall over the line – or at least be guaranteed second place.
All the while, turnout drops, citizens turn away and the link between representative government and people’s lives frays. Combine this binary party culture with our rigid centre of government and the whole system begins to look hopelessly creaky.
The push factors away from Westminster need no rehearsing. But apart from the obvious unpleasantness of the working environment, the normalisation of division and the relentless infighting, there are more nuanced critiques that arise only through stepping away from Westminster and looking back.
After 16 years in the House of Commons, Burnham is a fierce critic of the whips system, a punitive approach to politics that rewards obedience and stifles debate within the parties. The mayors have also been commended for their openness to cross-party working, but most of them take it as read.
North Tyneside Conservatives ‘Impersonate Labour’ in Alleged Bid to ‘Confuse the Electorate’ Over Suspended Candidate
A ‘Labour candidate suspension update’ was sent to residents – but not by Labour, and not just to the ward affected…
But most of all, what the Andys have given voice and a face to is a new approach to representation: politicians that gain their legitimacy from their distinctive people and place, and model a culture – cooperative, constructive, collegiate – to match. Their respect for one another and their collaborative efforts to pry more powers from Westminster have shown the possibility of putting party allegiance second place.
A working relationship forged through a shared approach, and trust built across party divides – is a rare thing in British politics – and has already done much to demonstrate that devolution is about cultural, not just political, change.
Elsewhere, this week we also saw the English’s penchant for independently-minded politicians pop up in other places. Jamie Driscoll ran an impressive grassroots campaign for the North East mayoralty, without machinery or much airtime. Labour’s rejection of him left him at a clear disadvantage in terms of backing, brand and resources, but, as elsewhere, it also liberated him from the confines of party orthodoxy. This allowed – even required – him to lean into participatory politics, drawing the support of groups like Green New Deal Rising.