The Prime Minister repeatedly lied to Parliament and the public about the lawbreaking that took place in his own house, reports Adam Bienkov

Sign up for our weekly Behind the Headlines email and get a free copy of Byline Times posted to you

Boris Johnson lied about the fact that illegal parties were held inside his own house during lockdown.

That is the unavoidable conclusion to be drawn from the news that police will issue 20 fines to individuals inside Johnson’s Government for breaking lockdown laws.

We do not know exactly who was found to have broken the law. Both the Metropolitan Police and Downing Street have refused to name the individuals concerned. 

However, what we do know beyond all reasonable doubt is that the Prime Minister lied about it.

On multiple occasions, both inside and outside Parliament, Johnson explicitly denied that any parties had taken place inside his house, while insisting that all laws and guidelines had been followed by everybody inside Number 10.

When footage emerged of his former press secretary Allegra Stratton joking about the parties, Johnson then told the House of Commons that he was “furious” about the impression that anyone in Downing Street had broken the rules.

Later the Sue Gray report confirmed that the parties had taken place and that the Prime Minister had attended some of them. Now the Metropolitan Police have confirmed that the law was broken at these parties.

As a result, we now know that the Prime Minister lied. He didn’t tell mistruths or make mistaken statements. He lied and did so repeatedly.

What should happen next should not be a matter of debate. According to the Ministerial Code, which was personally signed off by the Prime Minister, any member of the Government who has knowingly misled Parliament is expected to resign. It is now overwhelmingly clear that Johnson did exactly that and should therefore resign.

However, what is also clear is that he has no intention of doing so.

Asked on Tuesday whether Johnson would correct any of his statements to the House of Commons or resign, his spokesman said that he would not because he “has at all times sought to set out clearly his understanding of events”.

As this statement illustrates, it is not just the Prime Minister who has been dishonest, but his own spokespeople too.

When first asked about the parties at the start of December last year, Johnson’s spokespeople repeatedly flatly denied any had taken place and continued to do so despite mounting evidence to the contrary.

Of course, most governments and their spin doctors sometimes say things that aren’t true. However, the sheer scale of the dishonesty in this scandal is without any modern comparison.

The relentless and unashamed nature of Johnson’s attempts to mislead Parliament, the press, and the public, should be as much of a scandal as the actual lawbreaking itself.

The fact that the Prime Minister will not now even admit to his own dishonesty, let alone apologise for it, only compounds the disgrace he has already bought to his office.


Byline Times is funded by its subscribers. Receive our monthly print edition and help to support fearless, independent journalism.

New to Byline Times? Find out more about us


A new type of newspaper – independent, fearless, outside the system. Fund a better media.

Don’t miss a story! Sign up to our newsletter (and get a free edition posted to you)

Our leading investigations include: empire & the culture warBrexit, crony contractsRussian interferencethe Coronavirus pandemicdemocracy in danger, and the crisis in British journalism. We also introduce new voices of colour in Our Lives Matter.

More stories filed under Boris Johnson’s Hard Brexit

UK’s Brexit Trade Deal with Malaysia has Potential to Flood Market with Dirty Palm Oil

, 31 March 2023
In a weakened position due to Brexit, the UK has accepted Malaysia’s demands to reduce import tariffs on palm oil from the current 12% to 0%

Iraq and Brexit: A Common Thread of Hubris

, 23 March 2023
Both events were driven more by ideological conviction – than rational analysis – and against the advice of most experts, writes former diplomat Alexandra Hall Hall

Labour has ‘More Seats to Gain by Rejecting Brexit than it would Lose in Red Wall’, New Poll Suggests

, 22 March 2023
Keir Starmer could win an increased majority by turning against Brexit – but party officials are still rejecting any notion of rejoining the EU

More stories filed under Argument

What is the Future for British Steel?

, 31 March 2023
Pressures of decarbonisation and evolving international markets could lead to a significant slump in its competitiveness, writes Thomas Perrett

Stress Test: Will Sunak and Hunt's Brexit Banking Reforms Weather the Current Financial Turmoil?

, 30 March 2023
In the light of banking failures, Anthony Yates looks at how a plan for central bank digital currencies to protect depositors overlooks the key function of the financial sector - credit
crop man counting dollar banknotes

‘The Strangers’ Case? The Government’s Approach to Human Dignity, Asylum Seekers and a Lesson from Shakespeare’

, 30 March 2023
We must all examine our values and actions in relation to vulnerable populations, writes Iain Overton

More from the Byline Family