Government Procurement & the Lack of Trust
After the scandal of crony contracts, Stephen Colegrave digs into the Government’s Green Paper setting out a new regime to regulate nearly £300 billion in public spending
During the Coronavirus pandemic, Government procurement has become a major political issue. Byline Times was first to break the story of PPE contracts awarded without tender in April 2020 and since then has published over 50 stories that suggest incompetence and cronyism in Government procurement. The Byline Intelligence Team found six of the top 20 companies who have been awarded the most money from COVID- 19 contracts had connections to the Conservative Party.
What went wrong?
EU procurement rules require award notices for contracts typically over €221,000 to be published with detailed information about bids. Though the EU Withdrawal Agreement was still in force until 31 December 2020, the Government was determined not to be bound by these constraints and used the 2020 Coronavirus Act to trump all existing procurement rules.
The result was a scandal. The Government response appeared to give priority to procurement leads that came from their own contacts. The Public Accounts Committee recognised that many suppliers came from a priority lane that excluded health and care sector recognised suppliers and encouraged leads from Government officials, MPs and members of the House of Lords. Often the quality of the PPE procured was substandard and the Public Accounts Committee found that the result of poor procurement and planning left frontline workers “risking their own lives to provide treatment and care”. It is no coincidence that the UK had the highest health worker deaths in Europe.
Given this bad track record, what is the Government proposing to do about procurement now?
Until this year, the £270 billion Government procurement expenditure was governed by four planks of legislation: the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016, the Concession Contracts Regulations 2016 and the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011. All four provided strong safeguards for competition, transparency and accountability. The replacement for them was published in 2020 in Green Paper: ‘Transforming Public Procurement‘
There is no specific reference to the allegations of cronyism and conflicts of interest surrounding PPE procurement and the COVID-19 emergency. Instead, the Cabinet Minister in charge of procurement, Lord Agnew, makes references to “lessons learned” in his foreword to the paper
“COVID – 19 has meant that, across the public sector, commercial teams have had to procure contracts with extreme urgency to secure the vital supplies required to protect frontline NHS workers, maintain public services and support our communities”, Agnew acknowledged. “I make no apology for that,” he continued “but there are lessons we can learn and the reforms in this Green Paper will strengthen our longstanding and essential principles in public procurement of transparency, ensuring value for money and fair treatment of suppliers.”
While aspirations to “transparency, ensuring value for money and fair treatment of suppliers” are laudable, Lord Agnew gave a clearer indication of the direction of travel at an Institute for Government panel on 20 March this year.
In his keynote, Agnew says the new procurement regime “has been designed to balance the best commercial outcomes with the least burden to our businesses and the public sector” and that buyers across local and national government will be able to “take advantage of the freedoms” that have are available through leaving the EU. The Green Paper makes a commitment to reduce more than 350 regulations to a single regulatory framework.
Lord Agnew’s replacement for the former EU regime is the World Trade Organisation (WTO), and he said the UK would conform to the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA).
However, the WTO essentially regulates international trade for its members, whereas government procurement is generally a domestic and internal process, and most of the much-criticised PPE and COVID-19 contracts were to domestic companies.
On this, the Green Paper talks about opening up procurement to local suppliers and the third sector. However, opening up procurement to more bids and making this process transparent doesn’t mean the final decision will not be open to political interference. Often the largest suppliers are on frameworks that don’t need competitive bids. The dominance of the big six consultancy and accountancy firms and their access to the highest levels of the Government is not addressed.
Access is in the eye of the beholder. As the Financial Times reported, Conservative party donors get regular access to the Prime Minister for a donation of £250,000 demonstrate. Meanwhile, when it comes to decision making, it’s worth noting that there were 171 candidates for the recently advertised post to chair the Committee on Standards In Public Life. In the end, out of those 171, a friend of the Prime Minister from the Oxford University Bullingdon Club was selected.
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE?
HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
A Problem of Trust
Procurement encompasses more than £270 billion of national and local Government spending, a major part of taxpayers’ money and therefore is a matter of acute public interest. The Green Paper seeks to reassure us that procurement will be in safe hands even though there it has warning signs like the light touch and simplification of regulations. There are only four specific mentions of the problem of ‘conflict of interest’ in the 79-page document. Given the Government’s handling of contracts during the Coronavirus, the public could be forgiven for suspecting this problem has not been properly addressed.
A spokesperson for the Cabinet Office told Byline Times “we are very clear that the integrity of commercial decisions must be protected against actual or perceived conflicts of interest and there are strict measures in place to make sure that is the case”. The spokesperson also said the many mentions of “fair treatment of suppliers” also addressed the conflict of interest issue and linked to the recent Procurement Policy Notice, which directly addresses it.
However, the experience of the last two years shows that such light-touch regulation and focus on process can be bypassed. Major suppliers like large pharmaceutical companies, major consultancies and out-sourcing companies have regular access to senior people in Government. The fear that cronyism is deeply rooted in this Government is not dissipated by the appearance of an ‘old boys network’ of ‘good chaps’ increasingly appointed to regulators, governance positions and running major public sector organisations.
The Cabinet Office is asking the British people to take the new framework governing the spending of hundreds of billions of public money mainly on trust, when trust seems to be the one thing in short supply.
OUR JOURNALISM RELIES ON YOU
Byline Times is funded by its subscribers. Receive our monthly print edition and help to support fearless, independent journalism.
Thank you for reading this article
New to Byline Times? Find out more about us
SUBSCRIBE TO THE PRINT EDITION
A new type of newspaper – independent, fearless, outside the system. Fund a better media.
Don’t miss a story…
Our leading investigations include Brexit, Empire & the culture war, Russian interference, Coronavirus, cronyism and far right radicalisation. We also introduce new voices of colour in Our Lives Matter.