Fri 26 April 2019

There are many reasons to be concerned about the founder of WikiLeaks being extradited to the US – but publishing the truth isn’t one of them.

In the wake of his loss of asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy and arrest by British police, both Julian Assange’s lawyer and the Labour’s Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott have claimed that US authorities want to prosecute him for “publishing the truth” about US “war crimes”.

This is not the case.

As the federal indictment makes clear, the charges are for an alleged conspiracy to hack US defence computers, not for the publication of sensitive material.

Cast your mind back to the phone hacking scandal that closed down Rupert Murdoch’s News of the World, one of the oldest and most widely read English language newspapers in the world. The dozen or so journalists convicted of a conspiracy to intercept voicemails also ‘published the truth’, but obtained the material through illegal means.

In all the furore, let’s not forget the rights of this young woman.

Of course, the public interest in the publication of US diplomatic cables which led to the ‘WikiLeaks spring’ in 2011 is much more arguable than the salacious kiss-and-tell personal intrusion of phone hacking. As an early collaborator with WikiLeaks, Birgitta Jonsdottir, argues on the pages of Byline Times, much wider issues of press freedom are potentially at stake. But these have to be argued out properly in court. The extradition hearing is not the place to do that.

The rules governing the extradition request from the US are laid out in section 73 of the Extradition Act. It makes for dull reading. Suffice to say that, despite people’s natural instinct to argue whether or not Assange is guilty of the charges he faces in the US, that will not really form part of his legal argument against extradition from the UK.

Moreover, the US extradition request doesn’t help on two other important matters. It obscures the allegations of rape and sexual assault made against him in Sweden, and feeds the ‘paranoid libertarian’ position about the ‘deep state‘.

In 2017, Sweden effectively put the rape investigation on hold – knowing that it could not follow due process. But Sweden’s prosecutors this week said that, in the aftermath of Assange’s arrest in the UK, they are reviewing whether to re-activate the rape investigation.

It makes Assange a martyr against the ‘deep state’ while he probably worked alongside the deep state of a hostile power – Russia.

Assange remains innocent until proven guilty. But many people – including millions of women around the world – will be watching events closely to see whether the key European democracies now prioritise the demands of the US over what amounts to an alleged “hacking” case over an alleged rape.

In all the furore, let’s not forget the rights of this young woman.

Moreover, all these charges and allegations are nearly a decade old.


Be part of the team. Subscribe for:
• extra content • Naked Newsroom podcast • monthly meetings

sign up at or email

In the meantime, WikiLeaks has been associated with false allegations against Seth Rich (a democratic staffer murdered during the 2016 US Presidential election), possible political interference in that election and collusion with Russian military hackers, and the Vault 7 leak of cyber spying tools. All this has less to do with journalism and more with misinformation and hybrid warfare.

For many years, Assange has avoided British courts on the basis he would be rapidly extradited to the US and prosecuted for whistle-blowing. The US indictment (though only sealed two years ago) now proves his paranoia justified.

But, it makes Assange a martyr against the ‘deep state’ while he probably worked alongside the deep state of a hostile power – Russia. It creates another binary struggle in a world which is already too divided into black and white battles in which truth, the more nuanced truth about complex figures like Assange, is the first casualty.

And this does nothing for truth and transparency.

More from this Byline Times investigation:

Welcome to our Special Brexit Launch Edition

, 29 March 2019
Now seems like a good time to launch a new newspaper – but not for the reasons many expect. The heart of our paper will be investigations. We will follow the story wherever it goes, without fear or favour. No PR company, advertiser or press baron can influence the stories we choose.
Filed under:
Editorial Brexit

Islamophobia and the Limits of Free Speech

, 21 March 2019
How much longer can our mainstream press escape the consequences of their false reporting and dangerous rhetoric around our Muslim communities?
Filed under:
Argument Editorial Extremism

Don’t tear up our last shred of constitutional legitimacy

, 14 March 2019
For too long we've relied on unwritten norms to underpin our governance - norms of honesty, shame, resignation or apology for misleading parliament and the public or breaking ethical rules and professional guidelines... We need a written constitution to protect the public...
Filed under:
Argument Editorial Brexit Democracy

More stories filed under Argument

Neo-Darwinism and Neuro-Bigotry: Toby Young’s Hit Job on Greta Thunberg

, 25 April 2019
Louise Raw argues that the commentator and former free schools boss Toby Young has a track record attacking people with special educational needs.
Filed under:
Argument Activism

BREAKING Government Shows More Disdain for Greta Thunberg and Climate Change

, 24 April 2019
After the PM refused to meet Greta Thunberg yesterday, the Treasury shuns an important committee Inquiry about climate change this morning
Filed under:
Argument Reportage Activism Environment

BREAKING Tommy Robinson is set to Run for European Parliament – What Next?

, 24 April 2019
Louise Raw counters some of the myths around the former EDL founder and argues there is only one antidote if Robinson announces his candidacy
Filed under:
Argument European Union Extremism Foreign Affairs UK Politics

Fox Breaks Cover – from Revolutionary Communist to Farage’s Right Hand Woman

, 24 April 2019
Otto English on the weird moral maze of would-be Brexit Party MEP Claire Fox and her Spiked Network.
Filed under:
Argument Brexit European Union Extremism UK Politics