Today
Fri 26 April 2019
Subscribe

Attorney General Barr’s hasty decision to let Trump off the hook on obstruction of justice leaves a cloud of doubt that will linger for the remainder of Trump’s presidency.

Attorney General William Barr delivered a brief, four-page summary to Congress Sunday describing the findings of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s nearly two-year investigation.

The letter, which summarizes several aspects of the Russia investigation, claims that Mueller did not find evidence of a “tacit agreement” of coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia. On that matter, Barr was relaying a finding that Mueller had already reported.

On the matter of obstruction of justice, however, the conclusion is far less clear. In fact, Mueller didn’t actually make any conclusions regarding whether Trump obstructed justice.

The pair took it upon themselves to go beyond Mueller’s findings, in a way that was beneficial to their own interests and to those of the president.

“While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,” Mueller’s report states, according to Barr’s letter.

In other words, Mueller decided that he could not exonerate the president on charges that he obstructed justice.

Barr’s Prejudgement on Obstruction

But in his letter, Barr went beyond Mueller’s finding on obstruction. Within 48 hours of receiving the report, Trump’s hand-picked attorney general and deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein, cleared Trump of obstruction charges — something that Mueller wasn’t ready to do after 22 months of reviewing the evidence.

Mueller was not consulted on the letter.

Even more troubling is that before being nominated by Trump, Barr had already preemptively attacked the obstruction case that he weighed in on Sunday.

in an unsolicited memo to Rosenstein dated June 8, 2018, “Barr takes the view that a facially lawful action taken by the president under his Article II authority cannot constitute obstruction as a matter of constitutional law,” Lawfare reported in December.

The memo shows that Barr had already made up his mind about the obstruction case before he was even nominated to become attorney general. Indeed, it would not be a stretch to suggest that Barr’s memo was the very reason he was nominated to become Trump’s attorney general in the first place.

Furthermore, Rosenstein’s own actions surrounding the firing of former FBI Director James Comey were part of the conduct being investigated as potential obstruction of justice — meaning that both Barr and Rosenstein had compelling reasons to recuse themselves on the matter of obstruction of justice, but neither did.

Instead, the pair took it upon themselves to go beyond Mueller’s findings, in a way that was beneficial to their own interests and to those of the president.

Before being nominated by Trump, Barr had already preemptively attacked the obstruction case that he weighed in on Sunday.

Democrats are already calling foul. Rep. Jerry Nadler, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said Sunday that the committee will call on Barr to testify before Congress and defend his conclusion that there’s “not sufficient” evidence that Trump committed obstruction of justice.

In a series of tweets, Nadler slammed Barr’s hasty decision to let Trump off the hook on obstruction of justice, writing, “Special Counsel Mueller worked for 22 months to determine the extent to which President Trump obstructed justice. Attorney General Barr took 2 days to tell the American people that while the President is not exonerated, there will be no action by DOJ.”

In a joint statement, Senator Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi cast serious doubt on the idea that Barr could have reached his conclusions with any degree of neutrality.

“Given Mr. Barr’s public record of bias against the Special Counsel’s inquiry, he is not a neutral observer and is not in a position to make objective determinations about the report,” they said.

Barr may have been trying to do a favor for Trump, but instead he ended up leaving a cloud of doubt that will linger for the remainder of Trump’s presidency.

More from this Byline Times investigation:

UPDATE MUELLER REPORT – Assange spread Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory to Cover for Russia

, 20 April 2019
Assange and the “radical transparency” organisation he founded wittingly waged a disinformation campaign to provide cover for themselves — and they used a dead man’s name to do it.
Filed under:
Fact Mueller Mueller Report US Politics Wikileaks

BREAKING MUELLER REPORT: Trump and Campaign Officials Coordinated with WikiLeaks

, 18 April 2019
The Trump campaign didn’t have to coordinate directly with the Russian government — because it had a middleman to do its dirty work.
Filed under:
Reportage Mueller Report US Politics Wikileaks

MUELLER REPORT – Attorney General Bill Barr’s Timeline of a Cover-Up

, 18 April 2019
As the world awaits publication of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Bill Barr is readying himself for the final act of a slow-motion cover-up.
Filed under:
Reportage Mueller Mueller Report Trump United States of America US Politics

More stories filed under Argument

Neo-Darwinism and Neuro-Bigotry: Toby Young’s Hit Job on Greta Thunberg

, 25 April 2019
Louise Raw argues that the commentator and former free schools boss Toby Young has a track record attacking people with special educational needs.
Filed under:
Argument Activism

BREAKING Government Shows More Disdain for Greta Thunberg and Climate Change

, 24 April 2019
After the PM refused to meet Greta Thunberg yesterday, the Treasury shuns an important committee Inquiry about climate change this morning
Filed under:
Argument Reportage Activism Environment

BREAKING Tommy Robinson is set to Run for European Parliament – What Next?

, 24 April 2019
Louise Raw counters some of the myths around the former EDL founder and argues there is only one antidote if Robinson announces his candidacy
Filed under:
Argument European Union Extremism Foreign Affairs UK Politics

Fox Breaks Cover – from Revolutionary Communist to Farage’s Right Hand Woman

, 24 April 2019
Otto English on the weird moral maze of would-be Brexit Party MEP Claire Fox and her Spiked Network.
Filed under:
Argument Brexit European Union Extremism UK Politics