Free from fear or favour
No tracking. No cookies


For some people, a housing crisis means being denied planning permission for a loft conversion. For others, including a million plus people on the housing waiting list and an estimated 300,000 homeless people it means,quite simply, the inability to find an affordable home.

The biggest domestic challenge of our generation requires radical action, Paul Sng argues.

For some people, a housing crisis means being denied planning permission for a loft conversion. For others, including a million plus people on the housing waiting list and an estimated 300,000 homeless people it means, quite simply, the inability to find an affordable home. (By ‘affordable’, I mean a third of a person’s income, not 80% of the market rate.)

“Solving the housing crisis is the biggest domestic policy challenge of our generation,” announced Theresa May at the last Conservative Party conference. She’s right, of course. Unfortunately, her solutions don’t go far enough; they’re neither ambitious nor radical enough to provide the 300,000 homes needed each year to meet the demand.

May has pledged £2 billion for housing associations (who aren’t short of a few quid – the sector reported a surplus of £3.5 billion in 2017), yet this wouldn’t kick in until 2022 and would be spread across six years. She also committed to lifting the borrowing cap for councils, which drew loud praise from many in the housing sector, though it’s a bit late in the day, considering the extent to which the Right to Buy policy has decimated council housing stock since it was introduced in 1980. May’s attempts to repair the damage are a bit like putting a couple of plasters on a gunshot wound.

Unsurprisingly, the Labour Party was critical of the Prime Minister’s plans, with Shadow Housing Minister John Healey declaring: “If Conservative ministers are serious about fixing the housing crisis they should back Labour’s plans to build a million genuinely affordable homes, including the biggest council house-building programme for over 30 years.” Yet, in London it’s Labour-run councils that are responsible for allowing dozens of estates to fall into disrepair, through a process of managed decline, before working in cahoots with property developers to ‘regenerate’ estates with new homes that are unaffordable for the vast majority of previous tenants.

My documentary, Dispossession: The Great Social Housing Swindle, covers this in detail.

Councils argue that their budgets have been cut to the bone by central government, which forces them into what some housing campaigners view as nefarious arrangements with developers. The case of the Heygate estate is a prime example. But council rents and service charges to leaseholders are meant to be ring-fenced: the money should be allocated to repairs and maintenance of people’s homes.

What can those in the housing sector do, other than building more homes? Greater support for grassroots housing campaigns such as Focus E15,RadicalHousing Network and Save Cressingham Gardens would help.

And cutting back on self-congratulation by reducing the number of housing award ceremonies wouldn’t go amiss either.

Paul Sng is a writer and filmmaker based in Edinburgh. His book, Invisible Britain: Portraits of Hope and Resilience is available now.

Written by

This article was filed under

Subscribe to Byline Times

This website is free. We don’t have a paywall, there are no ads, we don’t profile you with intrusive analytics or track you with cookies. Unlike most UK papers, Byline Times is subscriber-funded. Our team is small, we keep overheads low, we pay journalists fairly… and we pay our taxes in the UK.

An easy way to support us is to receive our newsletter emails (and install our app, for iOS or Android); we gain insight into our readership, and you make sure you don’t miss vital news.

Subscribing to our print newspaper (from £3.75/month) is the best possible support for our journalism. We also sell gift vouchers and books.