Subscriptions
Read our Monthly Magazine
And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system
The wind-up of Advance UK has led to legal threats and recriminations between former activists and senior figures – with Byline Times able to reveal that party founder Ben Habib reported his own Chief Operating Officer to the police.
Advance UK, a competitor party to Reform and Restore Britain, formally deregistered with the Electoral Commission in July, amid fears it would only haemorrhage support to Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain.
It was set up by businessman Ben Habib, who was the co-deputy leader of Reform UK from October 2023 until he was removed and replaced by Richard Tice in July 2024.
Habib quit Reform in November 2024, after falling out with leader Nigel Farage and then chairman Zia Yusuf – with Habib backing a hardline stance in favour of mass deportations. Habib, who was born in Pakistan, had also called on far-right MP Rupert Lowe to be readmitted to Reform.
On 30 June 2025, Habib took over what was then the Integrity Party, relaunching it as ‘Advance UK’. That same day, former Reform MP Rupert Lowe launched his own project, ‘Restore Britain’ – which soon outflanked the party in every respect. Restore began as a ‘pressure group’ but formally registered as a party this February, and secured 9% of the vote in the recent Greater Manchester Mayoral election.
This July, Ben Habib announced his intention to merge Advance UK with the non-party campaign group ‘Great British PAC’, which he chairs. He launched a ballot of members to certify the move.
In an extraordinary intervention, Tim Power, the party’s Chief Operating Officer, wrote to all members shortly after the ballot went out, saying: “I am writing to inform you that the membership ballot launched on 5 June 2026 has been cancelled…
ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE
Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.
We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.
“The ballot was not conducted in accordance with that Constitution…Any decision to de-register the Party or merge it with another organisation requires a special resolution – a 75% supermajority – of a properly constituted College of Electors under Articles 1.7 and 2. The College has never been properly constituted.”
He added: “Advance UK is a company limited by guarantee. This means the Party’s assets – its funds, its membership database, its intellectual property and its brand – are held for the benefit of the Party’s objects as a registered political party. They do not belong to any individual and cannot simply be transferred to another organisation” – i.e. Great British PAC.
“GBPAC is not a registered political party. It does not stand candidates in elections. Its objects are materially different from those of Advance UK,” Power wrote.
He also claimed “any transfer of member personal data to GBPAC would require the individual consent of each member under UK GDPR. No such consent has been obtained.”
Power told Advance UK members: “What has happened over the last few days has exposed serious governance failings within this Party – failings that should have been addressed months ago and were not.
“A Board of Directors should have been properly constituted. A Treasurer should have been appointed. A College of Electors should have been properly elected by you, the membership, for the first time. None of that happened. And the result is that the Party arrived at this moment without the governance structures it needed to handle a decision of this magnitude properly.”
Don’t miss a story
Ben Habib soon restated the ballot, claiming Power was “wrong on all points and should be ignored.” He claimed the party was considering the “legal position.”
Around 8,000 members voted from the 38,000 potential voters (though Power claims there were over 50,000 registered on the party’s database), with the vast majority eventually backing the transfer.
Byline Times can reveal that Habib reported Power to the police under the Computer Misuse Act for allegedly hijacking party systems without permission, but the police said there was not enough evidence. Power has denied any wrongdoing – as has Habib – with the former stating: “I deliberately left the systems in a manner that facilitated access back to it and in fact provided a document to the IT team to guide the process and ensure that data integrity was maintained.” Habib says that particular issue “is over now” and has no plans to sue Power: “I can’t be bothered.”
This outlet can also report that Power has complained to the Electoral Commission over the winding up of Advance UK and the transfer of members over to GBPAC.
Byline Times has spoken to Ben Habib, Tim Power and the sole director of GBPAC, Claire Bullivant. The answers expose a range of contested claims, risks and disputes that show little sign of fading.
Nigel Farage Reported to Met Police Over Alleged Misconduct in Public Office
The Reform UK leader’s non-disclosure of a £5 million ‘gift’ from a crypto billionaire could amount to a criminal offence, leading democracy groups allege
Habib’s Defence
Habib has denied any breaking of the party’s constitution, saying: “When we agreed to deregister the party from the Electoral Commission and transition our membership over to GB PAC, that decision was taken…not by me, but by the College, getting 75 per cent of the College to vote in favour as a special resolution. I was then, as director of the company, directed by the college to implement that decision.” He cited the low turnout – around 20 percent – on the member ballot as down to it being conducted by email.
On whether the party complied with data protection law in handing over member data to GBPAC, Habib said: “We had an intellectual property lawyer advise us on the transfer, and there are provisions for the transfer of a business and its membership to take place, subject to certain emails being sent by both the donor of the business and the recipient of the business. We complied with the advice we got, and I’m one hundred per cent confident we’ve done everything appropriately.”
“If anyone feels we haven’t, they can resign — no one’s forcing them to remain a member — or they can complain to the ICO.”
For her part, GBPAC’s Claire Bullivant claimed the groups had followed legal advice over the transfer, and that transfer of Advance UK’s membership information “has been treated as a data-protection matter from the outset.” She denied that GBPAC had “controlled the [Advance UK] ballot or its outcome.”
Reform UK Tells Its Activists ‘Don’t Drink and Tweet’ Because ‘The Biggest Threat to Reform Is the People in It’
EXCLUSIVE: “If this was sat on the desk of an anti-Reform journalist, what are they going to do with it?” the leaked internal training course warn its members
Who Owns the Remains?
Former Chief Operating Officer Tim Power says he will keep up his fight.
He filed a complaint with the Electoral Commission on 6 June 2026, with a further addendum sent since.
He also submitted a Subject Access Request to Habib on 6 June, and formally raised a conflict of interest dispute concerning the party’s Data Protection Officer. Power says he took legal advice before all of the activities he undertook.
“In my view, the funds belong to the Party’s members and should remain under the Party’s control, subject to proper governance, rather than being transferred to another organisation,” Power said.
“My concern with a transfer to GBPAC is the undisclosed conflict of interest: Mr Habib is both the Party’s sole director and Chairman of GBPAC, meaning the same individual stood to benefit on both sides of the transaction.” (Habib has denied taking any money from Advance UK).
“In my view, any such transfer should have required a fully informed decision by the membership, taken under independent governance, rather than being decided unilaterally.”
He argues he was sidelined in the decision to deregister Advance UK, saying that despite being COO: “I have not been privy to any discussion, at any point, around the decision to move assets to GBPAC. If I had I would have argued it to be unconstitutional.”
Power now says he is launching a new political party – with the name not yet public – to replace Advance UK. He suggests it will be a “grassroots” version of Lowe’s Restore Britain. Lowe is the sole director of Restore Britain and no other senior figures are named on its website.
Advance UK had, this outlet understands, purchased a party-branded gazebo for every region in the UK. They cost around £2,000 pounds each. They were delivered, but activists never got the chance to use them. Why?
There were just four branches set up for a party of 38,000 people. Lowe, Farage, Habib: Does the far-right have an issue with one-man bands?
This outlet understands that Power’s new party will be formally registered with the Electoral Commission, with clear financial controls, before any member signs up or any donations accepted.
Got a story? Get in touch in confidence on josiah@bylinetimes.com
holding farage to account #reformUNCOVERED
While most the rest of the media seems to happy to give the handful of Reform MPs undue prominence, Byline Times is committed to tracking the activities of Nigel Farage’s party when actually in power
Contribute to our #ReformUncovered crowdfunder
Subscribers Get More from JOSIAH
Subscribers Get More from JOSIAHJosiah Mortimer also writes the On the Ground column, exclusive to the print edition of Byline Times.
So for more from him…
