Outside the system

Kemi Badenoch’s Conservatives are ‘Cynically Misrepresenting’ Statistics With Plan to Ban Non-Brits From Claiming Disability Benefits

Experts suggest Conservative frontbenchers are deliberately misleading the public

Kemi Badenoch's party is becoming more at ease with railing against "foreigners", and lumping them into one homogenous group. Photo: Abdullah Bailey / Alamy

Read Our Monthly Magazine

And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system

Conservative plans to ban all non-Brits from claiming disability benefits would be unworkable and could push children into poverty, according to campaigners and academics.

Over the weekend, Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said Personal Independence Payments (PIP) and disability payments under Universal Credit should be limited to UK citizens because his party believes “British citizenship should mean something.” 

He struggled to answer questions as to why his party didn’t make that change during its 14 years in power, as Politico noted. 

But while pushing the policy over the weekend, shadow policing minister Matt Vickers conflated asylum seekers – who cannot claim the benefit – with foreign nationals who arrived via regular routes and have legal status. Many of them will have worked and paid taxes in the UK for years. 

Vickers told Sky News: “This is about getting rid of some of those pull factors, about making, you know, why are all those people fleeing from France to come to the UK? Because they think life here is paid for.” 

ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE

Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.

We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.

He suggested that PIP and Universal Credit disability payments only go to those out of work – saying their plans would hit those who “ended up not working, [who] have ended up not contributing.” PIP is available to those in work (and out), as a way of supporting people who face extra costs due to their disabilities. 

Vickers added: “People who live here who are contributing need to be put first.”  Again, non-Brits who had lived here and worked here for decades would also be excluded under the Conservative plans. 

And he claimed: “We are paying out a billion pounds a month in sickness benefits to households with foreign nationals. That’s not acceptable.” 

However, the figure covers any household with a foreign national in it, which means it may be a British citizen claiming the benefit. In other words, the true figure may be nearer to £0. 

Specifically, the policy – added as a Conservative amendment to Labour’s stripped-back Universal Credit Bill – would significantly restrict PIP and Universal Credit payments for disabled people who have a Limited Capability for Work (LCW) or the more severe Limited Capability for Work- and Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) status. Those with LCW status are expected to be able to work in future with support, while those on LCWRA status are not. PIP recipients are often in work.

Don’t miss a story

Most migrants are already blocked from accessing public funds until they get permanent residence – they are on a ‘No Recourse to Public Funds’ condition from the Home Office. This has also applied to almost all EU nationals in the UK from 2021 (and longer for non-EU migrants).

Potential disability benefit claimants are subject to a residency check (known as ‘past presence test’) – where they must prove they have lived in the UK for the last two out of three years.

Byline Times has spoken to experts and campaigners about the Conservative proposals, which have been little-analysed so far.


Misleading Voters?

Cary Mitchell, a director at the internationalist campaign group Best for Britain, argues much of the rise in welfare spend in recent years was attributable to the last Conservative Government’s “shambolic handling” of the pandemic and its aftermath.

“The Conservatives are cynically and deliberately misrepresenting this general trend of their making to increase division,” Mitchell states.

“Studies show immigrants pay more into the public purse than they take out and vital public services like the NHS rely on people who come here from all over the world to work and who now call the UK home.”

Rob Ford, professor of politics at the University of Manchester, told Byline Times he doesn’t think the policy is “workable” or “thought through”.

“But I don’t think they will care too much. This is opposition politics – the point is getting attention.”

But should they succeed or return to Government, limiting disability benefits even further “risks pushing migrants with serious disabilities and health conditions into poverty, including those who have permanent residence and have lived in the UK for many years,” Marley Morris, associate director for migration at the progressive IPPR think tank said.

“We already have limits on access to benefits for most migrants before they get permanent residence; extending this further would be entirely out of line with the views of the public, the majority of whom think migrants who are working and paying taxes in the UK should be able to access benefits after at most three years,” Morris told Byline Times. 

BREAKING

Patel, Braverman and Jenrick Immigration Scheme Led to Unexpected and Unregulated Influx of 1.2 Million Foreign Workers

Nearly ten times as many entered the UK under under Brexiters’ unvetted skilled worker visa scheme as arrived in small boats

Professor Kim Hoque, Professor of Human Resource Management at King’s College London, says no one appears to have done any modelling of the Conservative proposals – “not least the people making this proposal, given [that] the £1bn figure relates to payments to households with a foreign national rather than payments to foreign nationals themse